Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

Compare covered companies

Iperion (IPR)Fletcher Building (FBU)Metro Performance Glass (MPG)

Showing 3 companies.

← Swipe to view more
Company comparison table
MetricIPR · FY26FBU · HY26MPG · FY26
Revenue$0m$2.9b$208.2m
Revenue growth %

Get updates for IPR vs FBU vs MPG

Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.

-100.0%
-20.0%Unprecedented lowUnprecedented low revenue growth. -20%; 4-period range -15.7% to 5.4%. Revenue growth: -20.0%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean -2.3%, range -15.7%-5.4%.
-2.7%
Operating profit-$0.3m$331m$18.2m
Operating profit margin %—11.5%8.7%
PBT-$0.3m$65m-$0.8m
NPAT-$0.3m-$11m-$0.9m
Operating cash flow-$0.27m$156m$15.7m
OCF / Operating profit %91.5%47.1%Unprecedented highUnprecedented high ocf / ebitda cash conversion. 47.1%; 4-period range -37.6% to 31.2%. OCF / EBITDA cash conversion: 47.1%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean -8.9%, range -37.6%-31.2%.86.1%
FCF pre-lease-$0.28m$6m$12.9m
FCF post-lease-$0.28m——
DPS0.0c——
Payout ratio vs NPAT %0.0%——
ROE %-546.3%-0.3%-1.6%
Net debt—$1.2b$27m

Source: latest published result for each selected company.

IPR vs FBU vs MPG comparison

Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.