Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Auckland International Airport (AIA) / HY26

Capex of $430.6m drives pre-lease FCF to -$245.2m as leverage hits 6.2x

Reported NPAT fell 5.5% on lower revaluations even as segment earnings grew, while heavy investment absorbed all operating cash and lifted net debt.

Transport & Infrastructure / Airports

AIA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $519.6m, versus $1b in FY25.

AIA EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 AIA: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 34%; 4-period range 47.8% to 80.7%. EBITDA margin: 34.0%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 67.6%, range 47.8%-80.7%.
  • FY23 AIA: Outside range low ebitda margin. 63.4%; 4-period range 65.2% to 252.3%. EBITDA margin: 63.4%, below normal range; 4-period mean 127.9%, range 65.2%-252.3%.
  • HY25 AIA: Outside range high ebitda margin. 80.7%; 4-period range 34% to 71.5%. EBITDA margin: 80.7%, above normal range; 4-period mean 55.9%, range 34.0%-71.5%.
EBITDA margin: 80.7%, above normal range; 4-period mean 55.9%, range 34.0%-71.5%.

AIA operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $185.4m, versus $474.3m in FY25.

AIA working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 AIA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $10.5m; 4-period range $-15.9m to $8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$10.5m, above normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-15.9m.
  • HY22 AIA: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-20.8m; 4-period range $3.1m to $30.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-20.8m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$16.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY22 AIA: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-15.9m; 4-period range $1.2m to $10.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-15.9m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$5.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY25 AIA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $30.7m; 4-period range $-20.8m to $23.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$30.7m, above normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$11.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-20.8m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$30.7m, above normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$11.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-20.8m.
Release date
19 February 2026
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$519.6m

+3.9% ↑ vs $499.9m

Net profit after tax

$177m

-5.5% ↓ vs $187.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$185.4m

-0.6% ↓ vs $186.6m

Final dividend per share

6.5c

+4.0% ↑ vs 6.3c

Cash and cash equivalents

$360.6m

-22.4% ↓ vs $464.4m

Total assets

$14.3b

+5.1% ↑ vs $13.6b

What changed

Revenue rose 3.9% to $519.6m and all three operating segments grew, with aeronautical revenue up 6.2% to $263.8m, retail and car parking up 3.1% to $143.0m, and property up 9.4% to $103.6m

Aeronautical segment result lifted from $185.9m to $202.4m and segment margins improved across the board.

Reported NPAT fell 5.5% to $177.0m and PBT fell 6.1% to $244.2m. The release flags that underlying NPAT, which excludes revaluation movements, rose 6% to $157.1m, and that operating EBITDAFI rose 6% to $371.3m on a like-for-like basis with the prior period's $403.1m EBITDA being a broader measure that included fair-value and associate items.

Operating cash flow was essentially flat at $185.4m. Capex of $430.6m absorbed it twice over, leaving pre-lease free cash flow of -$245.2m. Net debt climbed to $2.3b and net debt to EBITDA stepped up from 5.0x to 6.2x. Total assets reached an unprecedented $14.3b on Annolyse's historical baseline, against a four-period mean of $11.3b. The interim dividend was lifted 4% to 6.5 cps.

What matters

Reported earnings understate the operating read

Segment results were stronger across aeronautical, retail and property, and management's underlying NPAT was up 6%. The decline in reported NPAT and PBT is driven by lower non-operating revaluation movements rather than weaker trading, so the 5.5% headline drop is not the right number for judging operating performance.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

Leverage has stepped up materially. Net debt rose by roughly $293m year on year, and leverage moved from 5.0x to 6.2x EBITDA. While 6.2x is at the lower edge of the supplied four-period range (mean 10.92x, distorted by post-COVID earnings recovery), the direction of travel is clearly weakening as the capex programme runs ahead of operating cash generation.

Expectations

No forward-work backlog or stated revenue or earnings targets are supplied in this release

The available shape context shows HY25 contributed 49.8% of FY25 revenue and 44.5% of FY25 NPAT, indicating a modestly second-half-weighted year, while EBITDAF was first-half weighted at 57.5%. Annualising the current period at $1b suggests revenue can grow on FY25's $1b if H2 holds the H1 run-rate, though the supplied pattern implies a higher absolute H2 contribution to NPAT.

The bigger expectation question is not the P&L but the cash and leverage trajectory: at current capex intensity, the FCF deficit and rising net debt will continue regardless of the operating result, and that frames how shareholders should read the lifted dividend.

Quality of result

Cash conversion came in at 49.9% of EBITDA, sitting within the supplied four-period range of 46.3% to 74.2% (mean 59.3%) and modestly above the prior comparable's 46.3%

The result therefore is not flagged as a deterioration in cash conversion versus its own history, but the absolute level remains low and operating cash flow did not grow despite revenue growth and segment margin expansion.

Working capital was a modest $8.2m use, with debtor days at 31.7 sitting at the upper edge of the supplied historical range (mean 26.5 days, range 18.0 to 36.6 days). Two qualifications matter for the read on durability:

  • Pre-lease FCF of -$245.2m is below the historical four-period mean of -$179.4m, and at -138.6% of NPAT means reported earnings are not currently being matched by distributable cash.
  • ROE of 3.4% is unprecedented high in the supplied four-period baseline (mean 1.2%, range 0.1% to 1.9%), but is down slightly from 3.6% in the prior comparable, suggesting the asset base is now growing faster than earnings on it.

The operating result looks durable; the cash and balance-sheet quality is being assisted by debt funding while the build continues.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected peak year and total remaining envelope of the current aeronautical capex programme, and at what point does capex intensity normalise toward depreciation?
How will further capex be funded if operating cash flow continues to track flat, given net debt has already risen to $2,291.5m and leverage to 6.2x?
Is the 70%–90% of underlying-NPAT dividend policy still intended to apply through the peak investment years, even where pre-lease FCF cannot cover it?
Why have debtor days drifted to 31.7, at the upper edge of the supplied historical range, despite revenue growth being modest?
What is the expected timing and magnitude of any aeronautical pricing reset that might lift the cash conversion of the new asset base?

This briefing cannot assess the regulatory or pricing path for aeronautical charges, the project-level returns embedded in the current capex programme, or any covenant headroom on the rising debt stack.

Chat

Ask about AIA HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Auckland International Airport's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about AIA HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Auckland International Airport's HY26 result.

What is the expected peak year and total remaining envelope of the current aeronautical capex programme, and at what point does capex intensity normalise toward depreciation?Why does "Reported earnings understate the operating read" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for AIA after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

AIA - FY26 Interim Results

HY26 / results release↗

AIA - FY26 Interim Results Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

AIA - Interim Results Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report↗

AIA - Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

AIA - FY25 Interim Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

AIA - FY25 Interim Results Market Release

HY25 / results release↗

AYA - FY25 Interim Results Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Full-year context

AIA - FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

AIA - FY25 Annual Results Market Release

FY25 / results release↗

AIA - FY25 Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

AIA - 2025 Annual Meeting: Chair & Chief Executive addresses

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 6.20x, +1.20x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 49.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +3.6pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 62.6%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.6pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when AIA publishes next

Get the next Auckland International Airport briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.