Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
The a2 Milk Company (ATM) / HY26

Continuing-ops PBT up 27.7% but NPAT fell 88.1% on MVM exit

A $103.7m discontinued-operation loss from Mataura Valley Milk masks 30.4% continuing EBITDA growth and an upgraded FY26 outlook.

Consumer / Dairy nutrition

ATM revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $992.6m, versus $1.9b in FY25.

ATM EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 15.6%, versus 14.4% in FY25.

ATM operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $95.2m, versus $201.5m in FY25.

ATM working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$20.8m, versus -$29.5m in FY25.
Release date
16 February 2026
Published
20 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$992.6m

+11.2% ↑ vs $892.8m

EBITDA

$155m

+30.4% ↑ vs $118.9m

Net profit after tax

$10.9m

-88.1% ↓ vs $91.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$95.2m

+20.8% ↑ vs $78.8m

Interim dividend per share

11.5c

+35.3% ↑ vs 8.5c

Operating profit

$146.3m

+40.8% ↑ vs $104m

Profit before tax

$162.5m

+27.7% ↑ vs $127.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$896.9m

-13.9% ↓ vs $1b

What changed

Headline NPAT fell 88.1% to $10.9m, but this divergence is fully explained by a disclosed $103.7m after-tax loss from the discontinued Mataura Valley Milk (MVM) operation tied to the company's supply chain transformation

Underneath, continuing operations strengthened: revenue rose 11.2% to $992.6m, EBITDA rose 30.4% to $155.0m, operating profit rose 40.8% to $146.3m, and profit before tax rose 27.7% to $162.5m. Profit from continuing operations was $112.1m.

China and Other Asia carried the growth, with segment revenue of $739.0m and segment share rising 5.7pp to 74.5%; the USA segment loss narrowed. Operating cash flow rose 20.8% to $95.2m. Cash fell to $896.9m (from $1b) and gross borrowings were extinguished (from $66.8m to nil). The interim dividend lifted 35.3% to 11.5cps.

What matters

The discontinued operation, not the underlying business, drove the NPAT collapse

The 115.8pp gap between PBT growth (+27.7%) and NPAT growth (-88.1%) reflects the $103.7m after-tax MVM loss and a small movement in the effective tax rate (31.0% vs 34.0%). For the operating read, PBT and continuing-operations profit ($112.1m) are the cleaner measures; group NPAT is not comparable to the prior period.

Cash conversion eased even as headline cash flow rose. OCF/EBITDA fell from 66.3% to 61.4%, so the 30.4% EBITDA uplift converted to only 20.8% more operating cash. Working-capital movements helped (inventory days fell from 39.3 to 31.8, receivable days from 19.1 to 16.9), which means the deterioration is more about the EBITDA-to-cash translation than about debtor or stock build.

Capital return stepped up against a smaller capital base. The 11.5cps interim is 74.3% of group NPAT but a much more comfortable share of continuing-operations profit, and pre-lease FCF of $80.1m covers it. Combined with the elimination of gross borrowings, this signals confidence in the post-MVM business model, but cash on hand fell $145.2m and ROE printed 0.8% (vs 6.8%) because of the NPAT distortion.

Expectations

The release excerpts state the company "upgraded FY26 full year guidance" on the back of strong segment performance and 13.6% IMF revenue growth, but specific guidance figures are not in the extraction

Against the FY25 pattern, the first half ran at 46.9% of full-year revenue, 43.3% of EBITDA and 45.2% of NPAT, so the business is second-half weighted. Annualised current revenue is $2b, broadly tracking FY25's $1.9b base with the MVM revenue contribution now removed.

What this release supports is a stronger continuing-operations trajectory and a smaller, simpler revenue base; what it does not pin down is the quantum of the FY26 upgrade or the shape of the second half post-MVM exit.

Quality of result

The operating result looks durable

Continuing-operations EBITDA growth (+30.4%) outran revenue growth (+11.2%), implying margin expansion, and the China and Other Asia segment delivered both volume and mix. The discontinued-operation loss is a one-off, and the prior-period NPAT base did not include it, so headline comparisons overstate the deterioration.

Two quality caveats temper the read. First, cash conversion fell from 66.3% to 61.4%; the 20.8% OCF uplift lagged the 30.4% EBITDA uplift, and continuing-operations profit will not repeat the working-capital release indefinitely. Second, capex jumped from $2.4m to $15.1m (-1.5% of revenue, up from -0.3%), and the extraction does not detail whether this is supply-chain transformation spend or a step-change in run-rate intensity. Pre-lease FCF was $80.1m versus $76.4m, so capital intensity has risen but cash generation absorbed it. ROE of 0.8% is mechanically distorted by the MVM loss and is not a useful read on returns this period.

Unresolved

Open questions

What are the final cash and tax outflows associated with the MVM disposal, and is the $103.7m after-tax loss the full P&L impact?
Why did OCF/EBITDA fall to 61.4% from 66.3% despite a working-capital tailwind, and is the gap repeatable?
Is the $15.1m capex run-rate the new baseline post-MVM, or does it include one-off transformation spend?
What are the specific revenue, EBITDA and margin parameters of the upgraded FY26 guidance referenced in the release?
How should investors think about the dividend payout ratio going forward — against continuing-operations profit or against group NPAT?

This briefing cannot assess the financial terms of the MVM exit, the magnitude of the FY26 guidance upgrade, or the strategic fit of any current-period acquisition because those details are not present in the supplied extraction.

Chat

Ask about ATM HY26

Ask follow-up questions about The a2 Milk Company's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about ATM HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about The a2 Milk Company's HY26 result.

What are the final cash and tax outflows associated with the MVM disposal, and is the $103.7m after-tax loss the full P&L impact?Why does "The discontinued operation, not the underlying business, drove the NPAT collapse" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for ATM after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Report

HY26 / financial report↗

Media Release

HY26 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

1H25 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

1H25 Results Media Release

HY25 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Results & Supply Chain Transformation update media release

FY25 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Presentation

HY26 / commentary↗

The a2 Milk Company upgrades FY26 revenue guidance

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 61.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -4.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 115.8pp.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -5.80x, +2.40x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 74.3%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when ATM publishes next

Get the next The a2 Milk Company briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.