Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
CDL Investments New Zealand (CDI) / HY25

PBT fell 44.6% as tax normalisation flattered NPAT to +33.3%

Revenue dropped 17.2% in a subdued property market, and the headline NPAT gain reflects a 29.4% tax rate versus 70.2% prior, not improving operations.

Property / Residential development

CDI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $38.1m, versus $13.8m in HY25.

CDI EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 41%, versus 37.1% in HY25.

CDI operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -$9m, versus -$12.2m in HY25.

CDI working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 CDI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $3.3m; 3-period range $-3.1m to $2.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$3.3m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.1m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.5m.
  • FY24 CDI: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $0.4m; 4-period range $-0.3m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.4m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
  • HY25 CDI: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-3.1m; 3-period range $-1.9m to $3.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.9m.
  • FY25 CDI: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-0.3m; 4-period range $0m to $0.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.3m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.3m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
12 August 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$13.8m

-17.2% ↓ vs $16.6m

EBITDA

$5.1m

-37.4% ↓ vs $8.2m

Net profit after tax

$3.6m

+33.3% ↑ vs $2.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$12.2m

-87.6% ↓ vs −$6.5m

Operating profit

$4.8m

-38.8% ↓ vs $7.9m

Profit before tax

$5.1m

-44.6% ↓ vs $9.2m

Total assets

$323.9m

+3.3% ↑ vs $313.5m

What changed

The headline NPAT increase of +33.3% to NZ$3.6m is a tax artefact rather than an operating result

Profit before tax actually fell 44.6% to NZ$5.1m on revenue down 17.2% to NZ$13.8m, and the only reason after-tax profit moved the other way is that the effective tax rate normalised from 70.2% in HY24 (lifted by a one-off NZ$3.9m deferred tax adjustment on commercial-building depreciation, per the FY24 commentary) to 29.4% this period.

EBITDA fell 37.4% to NZ$5.1m and operating profit fell 38.8% to NZ$4.8m, both consistent with the PBT decline. Operating cash outflow widened to NZ$12.2m from NZ$6.5m a year earlier, while trade debtors shrank to NZ$3.8m from NZ$6.9m. Cash held was little changed at NZ$10.4m and total liabilities rose 58.5% to NZ$10.2m off a small base.

What matters

The cleaner operating read is materially weaker

  • PBT growth of -44.6% sits at the lower edge of CDI's recent range, and PBT margin of 37.1% is well below the supplied 3-period mean of 60.4% (range 55.4%-66.8%). For a residential land developer this matters because the quality of the period's profit has fallen even if the bottom-line print rose.
  • Demand did not respond to lower rates as management expected. The Directors' commentary explicitly notes that falling interest rates did not generate the anticipated lift in property-market activity, and revenue and profit could not be grown in the half. ROE of 1.1% versus a 3-period mean of 3.7% confirms that asset productivity is running below the company's own recent norm despite a stable equity base of NZ$313.7m.
  • The cash outflow nearly doubled even as receivables released NZ$3.1m. OCF of -NZ$12.2m against EBITDA of NZ$5.1m means the working-capital release on debtors was more than absorbed by other movements — most plausibly continued land and section development spend ahead of settlements. That widens the gap between accounting profit and cash, and it is the more important balance-sheet signal in the half.

Expectations

No quantitative target or guidance is provided

The supplied seasonality shape for FY24 had HY revenue at 33.9% of full year and HY NPAT at only 17.8%, implying a heavily second-half-weighted business in residential settlements. Annualising HY25 revenue gives NZ$27.5m, well below the FY24 NZ$49.1m base, so a flat full-year outcome would require a stronger second half than HY24 produced.

Management flags first sales from Iona Stage 1 in Havelock North with Stage 2 expected to commence early next year, and notes disappointment with the Future Development Strategy (FDS) process. Both point to project-timing risk around H2 settlement volumes that the release does not quantify.

Quality of result

The +33.3% NPAT growth is not durable

It is the mechanical consequence of a normalised tax rate (29.4%, within the historical range, versus a one-off 70.2% in HY24) applied to a smaller pre-tax profit. The PBT decline of 44.6% and the PBT-to-NPAT growth gap of -77.9 percentage points are the operating signal.

Cash quality also weakened. Operating cash conversion of -239.5% of EBITDA versus -79.9% prior is partly inherent to a land developer's working-capital cycle, but the deterioration is real: a NZ$3.1m reduction in trade debtors should have helped OCF, and the fact that operating outflow nonetheless doubled implies a meaningful step-up in development-related cash deployment. Capex on investment property of NZ$0.4m is small and not the driver. Total assets grew to NZ$323.9m, above the supplied historical baseline of NZ$306.5m-NZ$313.5m, consistent with that capital being put into inventory rather than returned.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the NZ$3.1m reduction in trade debtors not translate into improved operating cash flow, and what specifically absorbed it?
What is the expected H2 settlement profile across Prestons, Iona Stage 1 and the wider land bank, given that HY25 ran NZ$2.9m below HY24 revenue?
How will the FDS outcome and the Environmental Protection Authority panel process affect the medium-term development pipeline and capital commitment?
Is the 29.4% effective tax rate now the run-rate, or are further deferred-tax movements anticipated?
What level of further development cash outflow is expected in H2, and does the NZ$10.4m cash balance plus NZ$10.2m of liabilities give adequate headroom without new facilities?

This briefing cannot assess section sell-through pace, settlement timing, or land valuations because the release does not disclose forward-work, contracted-but-unsettled volumes, or independent valuation inputs.

Chat

Ask about CDI HY25

Ask follow-up questions about CDL Investments New Zealand's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CDI HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about CDL Investments New Zealand's HY25 result.

Why did the NZ$3.1m reduction in trade debtors not translate into improved operating cash flow, and what specifically absorbed it?Why does "The cleaner operating read is materially weaker" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for CDI after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

CDI HY25 Directors' Review

HY25 / results presentation↗

CDI HY25 Media Release

HY25 / media release↗

CDI HY25 Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

CDI HY25 Unaudited Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

CDI H1 2024 Media Release

HY24 / media release↗

CDI H1 2024 Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

CDI H1 2024 Unaudited Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

Full-year context

CDI FY2024 Audited Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

CDI FY2024 Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

CDI FY2024 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 77.9pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -17.2% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 1.1%, +0.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CDI publishes next

Get the next CDL Investments New Zealand briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.