Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Mainfreight (MFT) / HY23

Mainfreight PBT up 65.8% on 32.1% revenue, but capex doubled

Operating leverage and an FX tailwind drove earnings, but capex up 125.7% pushed FCF coverage of NPAT down to 51.5%.

Transport & Infrastructure / Freight and logistics

MFT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $5.4b, versus $5.2b in FY25.

MFT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 13.6%; 4-period range 14.1% to 15.3%. EBITDA margin: 13.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 14.7%, range 14.1%-15.3%.
  • FY24 MFT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 15.3%; 4-period range 13.6% to 15%. EBITDA margin: 15.3%, above normal range; 4-period mean 14.3%, range 13.6%-15.0%.
EBITDA margin: 15.3%, above normal range; 4-period mean 14.3%, range 13.6%-15.0%.

MFT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $589.4m, versus $584.4m in FY25.

MFT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $316.4m; 4-period range $-186.1m to $107.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$316.4m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$66.7m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-95.3m.
  • FY23 MFT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-186.1m; 4-period range $-4.6m to $316.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-186.1m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$149.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-186.1m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$149.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.6m.
Release date
10 November 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$3b

+32.1% ↑ vs $2.3b

EBITDA

$422.5m

+47.8% ↑ vs $285.9m

Net profit after tax

$217m

+65.9% ↑ vs $130.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$291.4m

+63.3% ↑ vs $178.4m

Interim dividend per share

85.0c

+54.5% ↑ vs 55.0c

Profit before tax

$301.7m

+65.8% ↑ vs $182m

Cash and cash equivalents

$260.9m

+115.4% ↑ vs $121.1m

Total assets

$3.5b

+34.0% ↑ vs $2.6b

What changed

Revenue rose 32.1% to NZ$3,003.3m and profit before tax rose 65.8% to NZ$301.7m, with NPAT up 65.9% to NZ$217.0m

EBITDA grew 47.8% to NZ$422.5m, materially outpacing revenue, so the period delivered genuine operating leverage rather than pass-through pricing alone. Management disclosed that on a constant-currency basis revenue growth was 26.3% and PBT growth 57.8%, so FX flattered the result but did not create it.

Operating cash flow rose 63.3% to NZ$291.4m and cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) improved to 69.0% from 62.4%. However, capex jumped 125.7% to NZ$179.7m, lifting capex intensity to 6.0% of revenue from 3.5%. Net debt fell to NZ$26.3m from NZ$115.7m, with cash more than doubling to NZ$260.9m. The interim dividend was lifted to 85c from 55c.

What matters

Operating leverage looks real, not just rate-driven

EBITDA growth of 47.8% on revenue growth of 32.1% means margin expanded even before stripping out FX. The constant-currency PBT growth of 57.8% on 26.3% revenue growth says the same thing in cleaner form. This matters because it suggests scale benefits are flowing through global network density, not only freight-rate cycle effects that will reverse.

Capital intensity has stepped up materially. Capex more than doubled to NZ$179.7m, taking pre-lease FCF/NPAT down to 51.5% from 75.6% despite operating cash flow growing 63.3%. The company is plainly mid-cycle on property and facilities investment. This matters because reported earnings strength is being recycled into the asset base, so headline NPAT growth is not flowing to shareholders at the same conversion rate as a year ago.

Balance sheet is now effectively unlevered. Net debt/EBITDA collapsed to 0.06x from 0.40x and equity grew NZ$466.2m to NZ$1.7b. ROE rose to 13.1% from 10.9%. This matters because Mainfreight is funding the heavy capex cycle internally with capacity to spare, removing financing risk from the investment program.

Expectations

No formal guidance or quantified targets were provided in the release; management referenced results being in line with their own expectations without specifying them

The historical shape is informative: in FY22, the first half accounted for only 43.6% of full-year revenue, 40.2% of EBITDA and 36.8% of NPAT, so the business has historically been second-half weighted. Annualising current first-half revenue gives NZ$6.0bn, but the 2H bias means the run-rate read is likely conservative if the demand environment holds.

The release does not support a view on whether freight-rate normalisation has begun affecting trading; this matters because the FX-adjusted growth, while strong, is the relevant baseline if rates soften into 2H.

Quality of result

The durable elements outweigh the timing-driven ones

EBITDA margin expansion is consistent with the constant-currency PBT growth (+57.8%) being well above constant-currency revenue growth (+26.3%), which is hard to manufacture through working capital or accounting choice. Cash conversion improved rather than weakened, and the effective tax rate was unchanged at 28.1%, so there is no tax-line distortion to back out of NPAT.

The qualifications sit on the cash side. Trade debtors grew 40.9% versus revenue growth of 32.1%, taking receivable days to 51.3 from 48.1 — a 3.2-day extension that absorbed working capital. Capex of NZ$179.7m absorbed most of the operating cash flow uplift, leaving pre-lease FCF at NZ$111.8m versus NZ$98.8m a year earlier. So while operating performance is high quality, shareholders' cash claim on this period's earnings is lower than the reported NPAT growth implies, and the 39.4% NPAT payout ratio on the lifted dividend is supported only because the balance sheet absorbed the gap.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of EBITDA margin expansion is attributable to freight rate levels versus structural network density, and how should investors think about margin resilience if rates normalise?
How long does the elevated capex cycle continue, and what return profile does management expect from the property and facilities investment?
Why did receivable days extend 3.2 days, and is this a function of mix, customer concentration, or collection timing?
Is the 85c interim dividend a re-based level or a function of strong first-half cash, given pre-lease FCF only covered 51.5% of NPAT?
Will second-half seasonality continue to be the dominant earnings half given the FY22 36.8% NPAT skew, and does management see that shape persisting?

This briefing cannot assess underlying freight rate trajectory, segment-level margin trends versus prior comparable period, or the expected return profile on the stepped-up capex, because the release does not disclose them.

Chat

Ask about MFT HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Mainfreight's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MFT HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Mainfreight's HY23 result.

What share of EBITDA margin expansion is attributable to freight rate levels versus structural network density, and how should investors think about margin resilience if rates normalise?Why does "Operating leverage looks real, not just rate-driven" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for MFT after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Mainfreight Commentary HY to 30 September 2022

HY23 / results presentation↗

Mainfreight Financial Statements to 30 September 2022

HY23 / financial report↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2022

HY23 / results announcement↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2022

HY23 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Mainfreight Financial Statements to 30 September 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2021

HY22 / results announcement↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2021

HY22 / results release↗

Full-year context

Mainfreight Full Year Financial Results to 31 March 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Release context

Mainfreight Annual Meeting Results 2022

HY23 / commentary↗

Mainfreight Limited - Investor Day / market update

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 69.0% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +6.6pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 32.1% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 39.4%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.06x, -0.34x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MFT publishes next

Get the next Mainfreight briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.