Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Mainfreight (MFT) / HY24

Mainfreight PBT fell 42.1% on a 21.6% revenue decline

Operating deleverage halved profit growth, cash conversion dropped to 58.3% from 69.0%, and the unchanged 85c interim now absorbs 68.7% of NPAT.

Transport & Infrastructure / Freight and logistics

MFT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $5.4b, versus $5.2b in FY25.

MFT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 13.6%; 4-period range 14.1% to 15.3%. EBITDA margin: 13.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 14.7%, range 14.1%-15.3%.
  • FY24 MFT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 15.3%; 4-period range 13.6% to 15%. EBITDA margin: 15.3%, above normal range; 4-period mean 14.3%, range 13.6%-15.0%.
EBITDA margin: 15.3%, above normal range; 4-period mean 14.3%, range 13.6%-15.0%.

MFT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $589.4m, versus $584.4m in FY25.

MFT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $316.4m; 4-period range $-186.1m to $107.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$316.4m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$66.7m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-95.3m.
  • FY23 MFT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-186.1m; 4-period range $-4.6m to $316.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-186.1m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$149.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-186.1m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$149.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.6m.
Release date
9 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$2.4b

-21.6% ↓ vs $3b

EBITDA

$320.3m

-24.2% ↓ vs $422.5m

Net profit after tax

$124.6m

-42.6% ↓ vs $217m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$186.8m

-35.9% ↓ vs $291.4m

Interim dividend per share

85.0c

flat vs 85.0c

Profit before tax

$174.8m

-42.1% ↓ vs $301.7m

Cash and cash equivalents

$234.5m

-10.1% ↓ vs $260.9m

Total assets

$3.5b

+0.5% ↑ vs $3.5b

What changed

Revenue fell 21.6% to NZ$2,355.0m as post-pandemic freight rates and volumes normalised against an exceptionally strong HY23 base

Earnings declined materially faster than revenue: EBITDA -24.2% to NZ$320.3m, PBT -42.1% to NZ$174.8m, and NPAT -42.6% to NZ$124.6m. The gap between the revenue and PBT decline points to operating deleverage on a largely fixed cost base.

Operating cash flow fell 35.9% to NZ$186.8m, a sharper drop than EBITDA. Free cash flow pre-lease compressed to NZ$48.8m from NZ$119.8m, even though capex spending was 19.6% lower at NZ$138.0m. The board held the interim dividend flat at 85 cps despite the earnings reset.

Reported gross borrowings dropped from NZ$1b to NZ$213.7m, but this largely reflects a presentation change: the prior figure included roughly NZ$722m of lease liabilities that are no longer captured in the current borrowings line. Cash fell only NZ$26.3m to NZ$234.5m.

What matters

Operating deleverage is the dominant story

Revenue declined 21.6% but PBT declined 42.1%, almost a 2x downside elasticity. EBITDA margin compressed to 13.6% from 14.1%, and the gap widens further at the PBT line as depreciation and finance costs do not flex with volumes. This matters because it shows the cost base built during the freight-rate surge has not been right-sized, and the next leg of margin recovery depends on either volume return or structural cost action rather than rate normalisation simply stopping.

Cash conversion deteriorated meaningfully. OCF/EBITDA fell to 58.3% from 69.0%, and FCF pre-lease/NPAT dropped to 39.2% from 55.2%. Trade debtors fell NZ$226.9m, which should have released working capital, yet OCF still fell faster than EBITDA. This implies payables and other working-capital lines moved against the group, and means reported earnings overstated cash generation this half.

The unchanged dividend now consumes 68.7% of NPAT versus 39.4% previously, and FCF pre-lease (NZ$48.8m) covers less than the interim payout before any second-half outflow. The flat 85c signals board confidence in normalisation but tightens the buffer if the second half does not recover.

Expectations

No formal guidance or forward-work disclosure is provided

The HY23 baseline contributed 52.9% of FY23 revenue, 49.6% of EBITDA and 50.9% of NPAT, so the prior shape was effectively balanced rather than second-half-weighted. Annualising the current half gives revenue of roughly NZ$4.7bn versus FY23's NZ$5.7bn — a useful indicative floor if the second half merely tracks the first.

The release does not support a view on when freight rates or volumes stabilise. Management commentary in the supplied excerpts notes a 23.0% FX-adjusted revenue decline and a 43.0% FX-adjusted NPAT decline, confirming the slide is operational rather than translation-driven.

Quality of result

The earnings result looks underpinned by genuine demand and pricing normalisation rather than one-offs — no non-recurring items are flagged, and the effective tax rate was stable at 28.8% versus 28.1%, so there is no tax distortion masking the operating read

ROE halved to 7.0% from 13.1%, which is a direct read on profitability rather than gearing change.

Cash quality is the weaker element. Despite a NZ$226.9m fall in trade debtors and improved receivable days (47.9 versus 51.3), operating cash flow declined faster than EBITDA, so the working-capital release did not flow through to cash. Capex at 5.9% of revenue is broadly in line with prior (5.7%), and the lower absolute spend reflects the smaller revenue base rather than a structural pullback.

The headline 78.8% drop in gross borrowings is not a like-for-like deleveraging. Prior-period gross borrowings included roughly NZ$722m of lease liabilities that the current presentation excludes, so the apparent move from NZ$748m net debt to a small net cash position should be read with caution.

Unresolved

Open questions

What proportion of the cost base does management consider structurally fixed at current volume levels, and what cost actions are under way?
Why did operating cash flow fall faster than EBITDA despite a NZ$226.9m release from trade debtors — which payables or accrual lines moved against the group?
Is an 85c interim sustainable if second-half FCF pre-lease does not recover beyond the NZ$48.8m run-rate?
How should the change in gross borrowings classification be reconciled to underlying lease and debt obligations?
Why is the Americas segment generating only NZ$12.0m of result on NZ$324.8m of revenue, and is this cyclical or structural?

This briefing cannot assess underlying volume versus price drivers within the revenue decline, since the release excerpts do not disaggregate the 21.6% movement.

Chat

Ask about MFT HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Mainfreight's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MFT HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Mainfreight's HY24 result.

What proportion of the cost base does management consider structurally fixed at current volume levels, and what cost actions are under way?Why does "Operating deleverage is the dominant story" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for MFT after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

F24 Half Year Presentation

HY24 / results presentation↗

Mainfreight Financial Statements 30 September 2023

HY24 / financial report↗

Mainfreight Results Announcement 30 September 2023

HY24 / results announcement↗

Mainfreight Results Announcement 30 September 2023

HY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Mainfreight Financial Statements to 30 September 2022

HY23 / financial report↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2022

HY23 / results announcement↗

Mainfreight NZX Results Announcement to 30 September 2022

HY23 / results release↗

Full-year context

Mainfreight Full Year Financial Results to 31 March 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

Release context

Mainfreight Annual Meeting Results 2023

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 58.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -10.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -21.6% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 68.7%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -0.07x, -1.84x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MFT publishes next

Get the next Mainfreight briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.