Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Napier Port Holdings (NPH) / HY21

Capex surged 97% to NZ$45.8m as PBT fell 30.5% on flat revenue

Pre-lease free cash flow swung to -NZ$31.2m and cash fell 83.5% to NZ$2.7m, funded by NZ$34.7m of new borrowings.

Transport & Infrastructure / Ports

NPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $84.9m, versus $157.7m in FY25.

NPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 32.3%, versus 40.7% in FY25.

NPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $23.8m, versus $63.6m in FY25.

NPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY21 NPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $6.8m; 3-period range $-1.9m to $4.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.9m.
  • HY22 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.9m; 3-period range $2.1m to $6.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.9m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.5m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 NPH: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $1.5m; 4-period range $0.2m to $0.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0.2m; 4-period range $0.4m to $1.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.2m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.2m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
25 May 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY21 vs HY20

Revenue

$52.6m

+0.6% ↑ vs $52.3m

Net profit after tax

$10.6m

-17.2% ↓ vs $12.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$14.6m

-32.9% ↓ vs $21.7m

Interim dividend per share

2.8c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$14.8m

-30.5% ↓ vs $21.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$2.7m

-83.5% ↓ vs $16.1m

Total assets

$425m

-18.8% ↓ vs $523.2m

What changed

Revenue was essentially flat at NZ$52.6m (+0.6%), with a 26.5% lift in bulk cargo revenue to NZ$20.2m offsetting the absence of cruise income and broadly steady container volumes of 135,000 TEU

Beneath that, profit before tax fell 30.5% to NZ$14.8m and net profit after tax fell 17.2% to NZ$10.6m, with the smaller NPAT decline driven by a normalisation of the effective tax rate from 39.7% to 28.6%.

The more material shift is on the cash side. Capex nearly doubled to NZ$45.8m (87.0% of revenue), pre-lease free cash flow swung to -NZ$31.2m from -NZ$1.5m, cash on hand fell 83.5% to NZ$2.7m and the group drew NZ$34.7m of borrowings, moving from a net cash position to net debt of NZ$32.1m. The board declared a 2.8 cent interim dividend (56.0% of NPAT).

What matters

Capex intensity has stepped up and is being debt-funded

  • Capex at 87.0% of revenue and a pre-lease FCF outflow of NZ$31.2m sit well below the historical baseline (mean +NZ$6.0m, range -NZ$30.7m to +NZ$21.1m). The funding mix has shifted from the post-IPO net cash position to net debt of NZ$32.1m within one half. This matters because the dividend is no longer covered by free cash flow during the build phase, so payout sustainability now depends on debt headroom and the timing of capex completion.

  • Working capital is absorbing more cash than the historical baseline. Operating working capital absorbed NZ$6.8m, well above the historical mean of NZ$1.6m, and debtor days rose to 59.7 from a baseline mean of 54.1 days (and 31.3 days in the prior comparable). Trade debtors nearly doubled to NZ$17.2m. That accounts for a meaningful share of the operating-cash-flow shortfall and warrants a clear management explanation before being treated as timing.

  • The tax line is masking the operating result. PBT fell 30.5% on revenue up 0.6%, but the headline NPAT decline of 17.2% understates that pressure because the effective tax rate normalised from 39.7% to 28.6%. The cleaner read of underlying operating performance is the PBT decline, which implies meaningful margin compression rather than the more modest deterioration the headline suggests.

Expectations

No FY21 target was disclosed in the release

The supplied shape context shows that in FY20 the first half generated 52.1% of full-year revenue and 58.3% of full-year NPAT, so the prior comparable was modestly first-half weighted on NPAT. Annualising current revenue points to roughly NZ$105.2m, only marginally ahead of FY20's NZ$100.4m.

What the release does not support is a view on when capex normalises or when cruise volumes return; both are central to whether the FCF deficit narrows in H2. The gap matters because cash on hand is now NZ$2.7m and further capex at H1 run-rates would require additional drawings against the borrowing facility.

Quality of result

The reported earnings shape overstates underlying resilience

Headline revenue stability reflects strong bulk-cargo conditions filling the cruise gap, but PBT down 30.5% on flat revenue is consistent with operating cost growth and lower-margin volume mix rather than a like-for-like result. NPAT was further supported by the tax-rate reset off the prior comparable's elevated 39.7%, so reported earnings flatter the underlying picture.

Cash quality is the weaker read. Operating cash flow fell 32.9% to NZ$14.6m, faster than PBT, with the gap partly explained by the NZ$6.8m working-capital absorption flagged by the historical baseline as above normal. Capex was the dominant cash-flow driver: at NZ$45.8m it consumed all operating cash and required new debt. Pre-lease FCF/NPAT of -295.1% means none of the reported earnings converted to distributable cash in the half, so the 56.0% NPAT payout was effectively funded from the balance sheet rather than the period's cash generation.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected peak and completion timing of the current capex programme, and what FY21 and FY22 capex envelope should investors anchor to?
Why did debtor days jump to 59.7 from 31.3, and how much of the NZ$6.8m working-capital build is expected to reverse in H2?
How will the dividend be funded through the capex peak if pre-lease FCF remains negative, and what is the board's coverage policy during construction?
What are the assumptions for cruise revenue recovery in FY22, and how sensitive is group margin to that line returning?
Will the NZ$34.7m drawn facility be sufficient through the build phase, or should investors expect further drawings or a capital event?

This briefing cannot assess the total cost, scheduled completion date, or expected return profile of the capital programme driving the current cash outflow.

Chat

Ask about NPH HY21

Ask follow-up questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NPH HY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY21 result.

What is the expected peak and completion timing of the current capex programme, and what FY21 and FY22 capex envelope should investors anchor to?Why does "Capex intensity has stepped up and is being debt-funded" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY21?What should I watch next for NPH after HY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NPH - 2021 Half Year Report

HY21 / financial report↗

NPH - 2021 Half Year Results Investor Presentation

HY21 / results presentation↗

NPH - 2021 NZX Half Year company filing

HY21 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2021 Half Year Results

HY21 / media release↗

Prior comparable period

NPH - 2020 NZX Half Year company filing

HY20 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2020 Half Year Results

HY20 / financial report↗

Full-year context

NPH - 2020 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

NPH - 2020 NZX Results Announcement

FY20 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2020 Full Year Results

FY20 / media release↗

Release context

NPH 2020 Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation

HY21 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 13.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 56.0%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 0.6% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 3.0%, -0.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NPH publishes next

Get the next Napier Port Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.