Revenue
$52.6m
+0.6% ↑ vs $52.3m
Pre-lease free cash flow swung to -NZ$31.2m and cash fell 83.5% to NZ$2.7m, funded by NZ$34.7m of new borrowings.
Revenue context before the current result.
Operating profit margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY21 vs HY20
Revenue
$52.6m
+0.6% ↑ vs $52.3m
Net profit after tax
$10.6m
-17.2% ↓ vs $12.8m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$14.6m
-32.9% ↓ vs $21.7m
Interim dividend per share
2.8c
— vs —
Profit before tax
$14.8m
-30.5% ↓ vs $21.3m
Cash and cash equivalents
$2.7m
-83.5% ↓ vs $16.1m
Total assets
$425m
-18.8% ↓ vs $523.2m
What changed
Beneath that, profit before tax fell 30.5% to NZ$14.8m and net profit after tax fell 17.2% to NZ$10.6m, with the smaller NPAT decline driven by a normalisation of the effective tax rate from 39.7% to 28.6%.
The more material shift is on the cash side. Capex nearly doubled to NZ$45.8m (87.0% of revenue), pre-lease free cash flow swung to -NZ$31.2m from -NZ$1.5m, cash on hand fell 83.5% to NZ$2.7m and the group drew NZ$34.7m of borrowings, moving from a net cash position to net debt of NZ$32.1m. The board declared a 2.8 cent interim dividend (56.0% of NPAT).
What matters
Capex at 87.0% of revenue and a pre-lease FCF outflow of NZ$31.2m sit well below the historical baseline (mean +NZ$6.0m, range -NZ$30.7m to +NZ$21.1m). The funding mix has shifted from the post-IPO net cash position to net debt of NZ$32.1m within one half. This matters because the dividend is no longer covered by free cash flow during the build phase, so payout sustainability now depends on debt headroom and the timing of capex completion.
Working capital is absorbing more cash than the historical baseline. Operating working capital absorbed NZ$6.8m, well above the historical mean of NZ$1.6m, and debtor days rose to 59.7 from a baseline mean of 54.1 days (and 31.3 days in the prior comparable). Trade debtors nearly doubled to NZ$17.2m. That accounts for a meaningful share of the operating-cash-flow shortfall and warrants a clear management explanation before being treated as timing.
The tax line is masking the operating result. PBT fell 30.5% on revenue up 0.6%, but the headline NPAT decline of 17.2% understates that pressure because the effective tax rate normalised from 39.7% to 28.6%. The cleaner read of underlying operating performance is the PBT decline, which implies meaningful margin compression rather than the more modest deterioration the headline suggests.
Expectations
The supplied shape context shows that in FY20 the first half generated 52.1% of full-year revenue and 58.3% of full-year NPAT, so the prior comparable was modestly first-half weighted on NPAT. Annualising current revenue points to roughly NZ$105.2m, only marginally ahead of FY20's NZ$100.4m.
What the release does not support is a view on when capex normalises or when cruise volumes return; both are central to whether the FCF deficit narrows in H2. The gap matters because cash on hand is now NZ$2.7m and further capex at H1 run-rates would require additional drawings against the borrowing facility.
Quality of result
Headline revenue stability reflects strong bulk-cargo conditions filling the cruise gap, but PBT down 30.5% on flat revenue is consistent with operating cost growth and lower-margin volume mix rather than a like-for-like result. NPAT was further supported by the tax-rate reset off the prior comparable's elevated 39.7%, so reported earnings flatter the underlying picture.
Cash quality is the weaker read. Operating cash flow fell 32.9% to NZ$14.6m, faster than PBT, with the gap partly explained by the NZ$6.8m working-capital absorption flagged by the historical baseline as above normal. Capex was the dominant cash-flow driver: at NZ$45.8m it consumed all operating cash and required new debt. Pre-lease FCF/NPAT of -295.1% means none of the reported earnings converted to distributable cash in the half, so the 56.0% NPAT payout was effectively funded from the balance sheet rather than the period's cash generation.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess the total cost, scheduled completion date, or expected return profile of the capital programme driving the current cash outflow.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY21 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
NPH - 2021 Half Year Report
HY21 / financial reportNPH - 2021 Half Year Results Investor Presentation
HY21 / results presentationNPH - 2021 NZX Half Year company filing
HY21 / results announcementNPH - NZX and Media Release - 2021 Half Year Results
HY21 / media releaseNPH - 2020 NZX Half Year company filing
HY20 / results announcementNPH - NZX and Media Release - 2020 Half Year Results
HY20 / financial reportNPH - 2020 Annual Report
FY20 / financial reportNPH - 2020 NZX Results Announcement
FY20 / results announcementNPH - NZX and Media Release - 2020 Full Year Results
FY20 / media releaseNPH 2020 Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation
HY21 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 13.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Dividend payout versus NPAT is 56.0%.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 0.6% for this reporting period.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was 3.0%, -0.3pp versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Napier Port Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.