Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Napier Port Holdings (NPH) / HY23

Revenue jumped 22.8% but PBT margin collapsed to an unprecedented 18.8%

Operating profit rose 33% on container and cruise recovery, yet PBT was flat at $11.7m and the interim dividend was cut 39%.

Transport & Infrastructure / Ports

NPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was $62.3m, versus $50.7m in HY22.

NPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was 35.1%, versus 32.4% in HY22.

NPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was $21.4m, versus $13m in HY22.

NPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY21 NPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $6.8m; 3-period range $-1.9m to $4.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.9m.
  • HY22 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.9m; 3-period range $2.1m to $6.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.9m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.5m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.9m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.5m, and none had a working-capital release.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$728.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

25.38x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.14

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

14.68x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

56.2x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.69x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

4.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
24 May 2023
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$62.3m

+22.8% ↑ vs $50.7m

Net profit after tax

$8.7m

-3.3% ↓ vs $9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$21.4m

+64.9% ↑ vs $13m

Interim dividend per share

1.7c

-39.3% ↓ vs 2.8c

Operating profit

$21.9m

+33.0% ↑ vs $16.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$4.1m

+30.7% ↑ vs $3.1m

Total assets

$564m

+3.8% ↑ vs $543.1m

What changed

Revenue rose 22.8% to $62.3m, an unprecedented growth rate against Annolyse's historical baseline (4-period mean 5.3%, range -3.6% to 13.4%), driven by container volume recovery and the return of cruise vessels

Operating profit jumped 33.0% to $21.9m. Despite that operating leverage, profit before tax slipped 0.8% to $11.7m and reported NPAT fell 3.3% to $8.7m, because finance and below-the-line costs absorbed the entire revenue uplift.

That gap shows up in margins: PBT margin compressed to 18.8% and NPAT margin to 14.0% — both unprecedented lows versus historical means of 29.9% and 21.0% respectively. Operating cash flow rose 64.9% to $21.4m and capex collapsed from $43.7m to $5.5m, swinging pre-lease free cash flow from -$30.7m to +$15.8m. The interim dividend was cut to 1.7 cents per share from 2.8c, a 39.3% reduction.

What matters

Margin compression is the real story

Revenue growth at an unprecedented 22.8% should have produced a much stronger bottom-line result. The fact that PBT margin dropped to 18.8% (11.1 percentage points below the historical mean) while operating profit grew 33% means costs below operating profit — primarily finance charges on gross borrowings that rose 11.6% to $132.0m — fully consumed the volume recovery. Cyclone Gabrielle disruption, flagged by management as diluting the positive trade outlook, also weighed on the period.

The cash flow turnaround is structural, not operational. Pre-lease FCF improved by roughly $46m year on year, but $38m of that came from capex normalising after the Wharf 6 build. Operating cash conversion improved, however the FCF/NPAT ratio of 182.1% reflects the capex cliff rather than a permanent step-up in cash quality.

The dividend cut sits awkwardly with the cash result. Cash generation was strong and the payout ratio fell to 38.6% of NPAT (versus 62.2% prior, at the lower edge of the historical range of 38.5%-65.0%). Management is reinvesting cash or building balance-sheet headroom rather than returning it — a meaningful signal given net debt rose to $127.9m from $115.2m.

Expectations

Napier Port's historical shape is second-half weighted: HY22 was only 44.3% of FY22 revenue and 44.0% of FY22 NPAT

Annualising the current period's revenue at $124.5m, and applying the historical first-half share, implies a full-year run-rate consistent with the supplied excerpt indicating FY23 was tracking to the upper end of previous underlying operating earnings guidance ($42m+) before cyclone disruption.

Management explicitly flagged that volumes and results were impacted by cyclone-related disruption. The release does not quantify recoverable insurance proceeds, post-cyclone volume recovery shape, or the run-rate of finance costs into the second half, so the gap between the strong revenue print and the flat earnings result remains the central uncertainty.

Quality of result

The reported result is lower quality than the headline revenue growth suggests

Operating profit growth of 33% did not translate into PBT growth, and the underlying NPAT figure cited by management ($7.5m, +3.9%) is materially below reported NPAT of $8.7m, indicating reported earnings benefited from items the company itself excludes from underlying measures.

Cash quality is mixed. Operating cash flow grew faster than earnings, helped by working capital discipline: debtor days fell to 50.8 from 54.9 (below normal range versus the 3-period mean of 57.0 days). However, trade debtors still rose $2.1m in absolute terms alongside revenue. The pre-lease FCF of $15.8m sits within Annolyse's historical baseline (4-period mean -$5.7m, range -$31.2m to $21.1m) and is driven almost entirely by capex stepping down post-Wharf 6, not by an operational margin improvement. ROE at 4.4% versus 4.7% prior is consistent with the operating margin compression.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the PBT shortfall is attributable to cyclone Gabrielle versus structural cost inflation, and how much is expected to reverse in the second half?
How will finance costs trend given gross borrowings of $132.0m and the rising-rate environment, and at what point does interest coverage become a constraint on the dividend?
Why was the interim dividend cut 39% when pre-lease FCF turned positive and the payout ratio is already at the lower edge of the historical range?
What is the expected sustaining capex run-rate now that Wharf 6 is complete, and does the new capex profile support a dividend reset?
Does underlying NPAT of $7.5m versus reported $8.7m reflect cyclone-related insurance recoveries or other one-offs the market should disregard?

This briefing cannot assess the magnitude of the cyclone impact on volumes or the durability of the finance-cost step-up because neither is quantified in the supplied release excerpts.

Chat

Ask about NPH HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NPH HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY23 result.

What share of the PBT shortfall is attributable to cyclone Gabrielle versus structural cost inflation, and how much is expected to reverse in the second half?Why does "Margin compression is the real story" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for NPH after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NPH - 2023 Half Year NZX Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

NPH - 2023 Half Year Report

HY23 / financial report↗

NPH - 2023 Half Year Results Investor Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2023 Half Year Results

HY23 / media release↗

Prior comparable period

NPH - 2022 Half Year NZX Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

NPH - 2022 Half Year Report

HY22 / financial report↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2022 Half Year Results

HY22 / media release↗

Full-year context

NPH - 2022 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

NPH - 2022 NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2022 Full Year Results

FY22 / media release↗

Release context

NPH 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 2.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 22.8% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 59.4%, with NPAT payout at 38.6%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 4.4%, -0.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NPH publishes next

Get the next Napier Port Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.