Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Napier Port Holdings (NPH) / HY25

PBT up 24.8% on unprecedented 36.1% margin; tax drop lifts NPAT to +41.3%

Container volume recovery delivered record half-year port margins, while a normalised effective tax rate flatters headline NPAT growth.

Transport & Infrastructure / Ports

NPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $84.9m, versus $157.7m in FY25.

NPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 32.3%, versus 40.7% in FY25.

NPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $23.8m, versus $63.6m in FY25.

NPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY21 NPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $6.8m; 3-period range $-1.9m to $4.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.9m.
  • HY22 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.9m; 3-period range $2.1m to $6.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.9m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.5m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 NPH: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $1.5m; 4-period range $0.2m to $0.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0.2m; 4-period range $0.4m to $1.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.2m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.2m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
21 May 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$78.1m

+10.6% ↑ vs $70.6m

Net profit after tax

$20.2m

+41.3% ↑ vs $14.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$34.6m

+37.0% ↑ vs $25.3m

Interim dividend per share

6.5c

+116.7% ↑ vs 3.0c

Operating profit

$33.1m

+21.1% ↑ vs $27.4m

Profit before tax

$28.2m

+24.8% ↑ vs $22.6m

Total assets

$581.1m

-0.7% ↓ vs $585m

What changed

Profit before tax grew 24.8% to $28.2m on revenue up 10.6% to $78.1m, lifting the PBT margin to 36.1% — an unprecedented high against the supplied four-period historical range of 18.7%–32.0% and a mean of 25.5%

Reported NPAT rose 41.3% to $20.2m, but that overstates underlying earnings progress because the effective tax rate fell to 28.4% from 36.5% in the prior comparable; PBT growth of 24.8% is the cleaner operating read.

Operating cash flow rose 37.0% to $34.6m and pre-lease free cash flow reached $21.1m, above the supplied historical range. Capex nearly doubled to $13.6m (17.4% of revenue versus 10.4% prior). Gross borrowings fell to $104.1m from $119.7m, and the directors declared a 6.5 cent interim dividend (including a special), versus 3.0 cents prior, lifting the payout ratio against NPAT to 65.0%.

What matters

Margin expansion looks structurally driven, not cyclical noise

A PBT margin of 36.1% is materially above the supplied four-period mean of 25.5% and the prior peak of 32.0%. Management commentary attributes the volume step-up to Pan Pac's return to full pulp and timber operations, an earlier apple harvest, and stronger transhipment and DLR activity. This matters because the operating leverage — revenue +10.6%, PBT +24.8% — converted volume recovery into disproportionately higher returns, and the supplied baseline now classifies ROE at 4.7% as above its normal range.

The headline NPAT figure is flattered by tax normalisation. The 16.5 percentage-point gap between PBT growth (24.8%) and NPAT growth (41.3%) is almost entirely a tax-rate effect: 28.4% this period versus 36.5% prior, with the current rate sitting essentially on the supplied historical mean of 28.6%. Investors anchoring to the +41.3% NPAT print will overstate the underlying earnings trajectory; the prior period's tax rate looks to have been the anomaly.

Capital intensity stepped up while distribution rose. Capex grew 84.2% and now consumes 17.4% of revenue. The interim dividend more than doubled and the payout ratio against NPAT (65.0%) sits above the supplied historical range (mean 48.8%, max 62.2%). Both can coexist this period because cash generation was strong and net debt fell, but the combination tightens the buffer if either earnings or volumes soften.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance are supplied in the release, so this result is judged against historical shape rather than a stated plan

The supplied prior pattern shows HY24 contributed 49.9% of FY24 revenue but 57.7% of FY24 NPAT, indicating a first-half-weighted earnings shape that may temper second-half expectations even on a like-for-like basis. Annualising the current run-rate gives roughly $156m of revenue, but the seasonal skew and the lift in capex intensity argue against a simple doubling of HY25 earnings.

The release does not quantify volume guidance or the timing of the elevated capex programme, so the durability of the margin step-up cannot be tested against management's own forward indicators in this filing.

Quality of result

The cash quality of this result is genuinely strong

Operating cash flow grew faster than PBT, pre-lease free cash flow of $21.1m sits above the supplied historical range (mean −$7.0m), and FCF/NPAT conversion of 104.5% supports the reported earnings. Net debt reduction of roughly $17m and a $10.7m equity build reinforce the read that this period's earnings were largely cash-backed rather than accrual-flattered.

Two qualifications matter for durability. First, around 8 percentage points of the NPAT growth print reflects the lower effective tax rate rather than operating improvement; reverting to the historical mean tax rate in future periods would compress reported NPAT growth even if PBT continued at this trajectory. Second, the 84.2% jump in capex signals an investment cycle that has not yet flowed through to depreciation or to a reduction in pre-lease free cash flow this period, but will weigh on both if sustained. The unprecedented margin level itself warrants scrutiny: the supplied baseline shows nothing in the prior four halves at this level, so a partial mean-reversion is the base case absent a structural explanation.

Unresolved

Open questions

What proportion of the volume uplift reflects one-off catch-up (Pan Pac restart, earlier apple harvest) versus a sustainable run-rate?
Why has capex intensity risen to 17.4% of revenue, and what is the multi-year capex envelope embedded in the current investment cycle?
Is the 6.5 cent interim dividend (including a special) intended as a one-off return of the cash-flow surplus, or a reset of the ordinary distribution base?
What drove the effective tax rate from 36.5% to 28.4%, and which rate is the right anchor for forward modelling?
How should investors interpret the PBT margin at 36.1% against the prior four-period range of 18.7%–32.0% — is this a new operating ceiling or a peak that requires volume tailwinds to sustain?

This briefing cannot assess segment-level revenue or margin contribution, container versus bulk yield economics, or the specific composition of the capex programme, none of which are quantified in the supplied data.

Chat

Ask about NPH HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NPH HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Napier Port Holdings's HY25 result.

What proportion of the volume uplift reflects one-off catch-up (Pan Pac restart, earlier apple harvest) versus a sustainable run-rate?Why does "Margin expansion looks structurally driven, not cyclical noise" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for NPH after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NPH - 2025 Half Year NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

NPH - 2025 Half Year Report

HY25 / financial report↗

NPH - 2025 Half Year Results Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2025 Half Year Results

HY25 / media release↗

Prior comparable period

NPH - 2024 Half Year NZX Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

NPH - 2024 Half Year Report

HY24 / financial report↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2024 Half Year Results

HY24 / media release↗

Full-year context

NPH - 2024 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

NPH - 2024 NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2024 Full Year Results

FY24 / media release↗

Release context

NPH 2024 Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

NPH 2025 Investor Day Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 16.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 65.0%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 10.6% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 4.7%, +1.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NPH publishes next

Get the next Napier Port Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.