Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
New Zealand King Salmon Investments (NZK) / HY25

NPAT fell 43% but pro-forma EBITDA rose to $13.5m on biological-asset swing

A $7.7m non-cash biological-asset/inventory swing pulled GAAP earnings down even as volumes, revenue and the company's guided pro-forma measure

Primary Industries / Aquaculture

NZK revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $100.3m, versus $94.5m in HY26.

NZK EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY26 NZK: Outside range low ebitda margin. 6.1%; 3-period range 12.3% to 23.9%. EBITDA margin: 6.1%, below normal range; 3-period mean 18.8%, range 12.3%-23.9%.
EBITDA margin: 6.1%, below normal range; 3-period mean 18.8%, range 12.3%-23.9%.

NZK operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $7.3m, versus $19.6m in HY26.

NZK working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY25 NZK: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $10.9m; 3-period range $-17.8m to $3.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$10.9m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.9m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-9.3m.
  • HY26 NZK: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-17.8m; 3-period range $-0.9m to $10.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-17.8m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.9m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-17.8m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.9m.
Release date
24 September 2024
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$101.7m

+11.1% ↑ vs $91.6m

EBITDA

$12.5m

-32.4% ↓ vs $18.5m

Net profit after tax

$6m

-43.4% ↓ vs $10.6m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$16.2m

+37.7% ↑ vs $11.8m

Interim dividend per share

0.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$9.2m

-38.3% ↓ vs $14.9m

Total assets

$241.4m

+1.0% ↑ vs $238.9m

What changed

Revenue grew 11.1% to $101.7m on a 5% lift in sales volumes (3,178MT versus 3,023MT), but GAAP earnings moved sharply the other way

EBITDA fell 32.4% to $12.5m, PBT fell 38.3% to $9.2m and NPAT fell 43.4% to $6.0m (HY24 $10.6m).

The headline gap is driven by non-cash accounting on biological assets and inventory: a $3.6m loss this period versus a $4.1m gain last period, a $7.7m swing. Stripping that out, the company's preferred pro-forma EBITDA measure actually rose to $13.5m from $10.7m.

Operating cash inflow rose 37.7% to $16.2m, capex tripled to $5.2m and the cash balance ended at $28.3m against $3.1m of borrowings, leaving the group in a net-cash position broadly unchanged from HY24. No interim dividend was declared.

What matters

Underlying improvement is masked by a non-cash accounting swing

Pro-forma EBITDA — the metric the company guides to — rose roughly 26% to $13.5m on higher volumes and revenue, while GAAP EBITDA fell because biological-asset and inventory revaluations flipped from a $4.1m gain to a $3.6m loss. The cleaner operating read is the pro-forma figure; the GAAP decline does not by itself indicate a deterioration in trading performance.

Inventory and capex are absorbing cash even as headline OCF looks strong. Inventories rose 32.6% to $35.6m, lifting inventory days to 63.6 from 53.3 (+10.3 days), and capex jumped 231% to $5.2m (5.1% of revenue versus 1.7%). This is consistent with a stocking and reinvestment phase rather than a steady-state harvest.

Guidance was narrowed downward at the top end. FY25 pro-forma EBITDA guidance moved to $26m–$30m from the original $26m–$32m. The floor is unchanged, but the upside case has been removed, which matters because FY24 pro-forma EBITDA was $24.5m — so the new range still implies modest growth, but less of it than originally signalled.

Expectations

The release shows HY24 contributed 75.3% of FY24 GAAP EBITDA, indicating a heavily first-half-weighted earnings shape under last year's biological-asset gain

With HY25 GAAP EBITDA at $12.5m and FY25 pro-forma guidance at $26m–$30m, the implied second-half pro-forma EBITDA is roughly $12.5m–$16.5m, against $13.8m delivered in 2H24 on a pro-forma basis. That makes 2H25 a meaningful test: delivery to the midpoint requires a result around or slightly above the prior 2H, after a 1H that was already running well ahead.

The narrower guidance band reduces the size of the upside surprise available, so the focus shifts to whether harvest, pricing and biological performance can hold the inventory build that has accumulated through 1H.

Quality of result

Cash conversion looks unusually strong — OCF/EBITDA of 129.8% versus 63.8% — but most of that ratio movement reflects non-cash GAAP losses being added back rather than improved working-capital efficiency

Trade debtors rose 16% (+1.2 receivable days) and inventory days rose 10.3 days, so the working-capital cycle is lengthening, not tightening. FCF pre-lease of $11.0m, only marginally above $10.2m last period, is a more durable read on cash generation than the headline OCF.

Capex at 5.1% of revenue (versus 1.7%) is a real call on cash and a step-change in investment intensity. The combination of inventory build, higher debtor days and tripled capex means the cash position held flat rather than building, despite revenue growth and improved underlying trading. ROE of 3.1% (versus 6.1%) reflects both lower NPAT and a larger equity base. Overall, the underlying trading improvement is genuine, but headline cash and conversion ratios flatter the result.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove the $7.7m biological-asset/inventory swing, and how confident is management that 2H will not see another adverse mark?
Why was the FY25 pro-forma EBITDA top end cut from $32m to $30m, and what assumptions changed?
What is the strategic rationale for the 32.6% inventory build, and when does it convert to revenue?
Why has capex stepped up 231% on prior, and is this a one-off project spend or a sustained higher run-rate?
Why was no interim dividend declared given the net-cash balance sheet and positive FCF, and what is the framework for resuming distributions?

This briefing cannot assess salmon harvest biology, pricing trajectories, or the supportability of the pro-forma adjustments without management's segment and cost detail.

Chat

Ask about NZK HY25

Ask follow-up questions about New Zealand King Salmon Investments's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NZK HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about New Zealand King Salmon Investments's HY25 result.

What specifically drove the $7.7m biological-asset/inventory swing, and how confident is management that 2H will not see another adverse mark?Why does "Underlying improvement is masked by a non-cash accounting swing" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for NZK after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZK 1HY25 Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

NZK 1HY25 Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NZK 1HY25 Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

NZK NZX Results Template

HY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

NZK - 1HY24 Interim Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

NZK Half Year Results Announcement FY24

HY24 / results announcement↗

NZK Half Year Results Announcement FY24

HY24 / results release↗

Full-year context

NZK - Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

NZK - Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

NZK FY24 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 5.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 64 days, +10 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 129.8% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +66.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -2.02x, -0.65x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NZK publishes next

Get the next New Zealand King Salmon Investments briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.