Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Rakon (RAK) / FY23

Revenue grew 4.9% but operating cash flow collapsed 63% and FCF turned negative

Capex more than doubled and working capital absorbed $15.0m, turning a $21.8m FCF inflow into a $7.6m outflow while NPAT fell 29.9%.

Technology / Electronics

RAK revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $54.2m, versus $41.7m in HY25.

RAK EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 6.6%, versus -37.9% in HY25.

RAK operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.4m, versus $8.3m in HY25.

RAK working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 RAK: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $33.8m; 3-period range $-18.7m to $28.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$33.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$26.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-18.7m.
  • HY25 RAK: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-18.7m; 3-period range $24m to $33.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-18.7m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$28.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-18.7m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$28.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
24 May 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$180.3m

+4.9% ↑ vs $172m

EBITDA

$42.2m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$23.2m

-29.9% ↓ vs $33.1m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$11.1m

-63.3% ↓ vs $30.2m

Final dividend per share

1.5c

— vs —

Operating profit

$33.3m

-19.5% ↓ vs $41.4m

Profit before tax

$31.4m

-25.1% ↓ vs $41.9m

Cash and cash equivalents

$21.7m

-44.6% ↓ vs $39.2m

What changed

Revenue rose 4.9% to $180.3m, but the cash and earnings picture moved sharply the other way

Operating cash flow fell 63.3% to $11.1m (FY22: $30.2m), and free cash flow before lease payments swung from a $21.8m inflow to a $7.6m outflow. Cash on the balance sheet dropped 44.6% to $21.7m.

Underlying EBITDA fell to $42.2m from $54.4m (per the release), PBT declined 25.1% to $31.4m, and NPAT declined 29.9% to $23.2m. The NPAT fall is amplified by the effective tax rate moving to 26.0% from 21.0%; the cleaner operating read is the 25.1% PBT decline.

Capex more than doubled to $18.7m (+121%), lifting capex intensity from 4.9% to 10.4% of revenue. Gross borrowings were paid down to $5.2m from $16.0m, and a 1.5 cents per share final dividend was declared under the new policy.

What matters

Cash conversion deteriorated sharply

OCF/EBITDA fell to 26.3% from 55.6%, and working capital absorbed roughly $15.0m as receivable days extended to 84.5 from 68.1 and inventory days rose to 126.7 from 121.7. The release attributes the inventory build to supply-chain resilience and inflation, but the receivables stretch is not explained. This matters because revenue growth this year was funded by the balance sheet rather than converted to cash.

Free cash flow is negative even before lease payments. With capex up $10.2m and OCF down $19.1m, FCF pre-lease was -$7.6m, so FCF/NPAT was -32.7%. The 1.5 cps dividend equates to a 14.7% payout of NPAT but is not covered by free cash flow at all; it is being paid out of the prior cash pile.

Earnings declined despite revenue growth. PBT fell 25.1% on only 4.9% revenue growth, which implies meaningful operating-cost build — consistent with the release's reference to "increased investment in growth initiatives." ROE fell to 14.8% from 24.5%, reflecting both lower NPAT and a larger equity base.

Expectations

No quantitative FY24 target or forward-work figure has been supplied in this release

What can be observed is the half-year shape: HY23 delivered 48.3% of full-year revenue but 66.5% of EBITDA and 69.0% of NPAT, implying a materially weaker second half (implied H2 EBITDA $14.1m, implied H2 NPAT $7.2m). Operating cash flow was essentially nil at the half ($0.0m) and reached $11.1m for the year, so the second-half cash performance was the better period in isolation but still well below the prior year.

This release does not support an inference that earnings momentum is rebuilding into FY24; it supports a read that the second half was the weaker earnings half while capex spend accelerated.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is weaker than the headline 4.9% revenue growth suggests

The PBT decline is real operating compression, not a one-off — there is no discontinued operation or disclosed non-recurring item explaining the gap. The further drop to NPAT is partly tax-rate normalisation (26.0% vs 21.0%), which is a presentational distortion rather than an operating one.

Cash quality is the bigger concern. The full $19.1m fall in OCF and the $7.6m FCF outflow are driven by working-capital absorption ($15.0m) and a near-doubling of capex. Inventory build for supply-chain resilience may be deliberate and partly reversible, but receivable days extending 16.4 days is harder to characterise as a strategic choice. The dividend is funded from prior balance-sheet cash rather than current-year free cash flow, which is sustainable only while the cash buffer holds or until capex moderates.

The investment phase is visible: capex at 10.4% of revenue versus 4.9% prior, growth-driven opex, and borrowings repaid. Whether that investment converts into FY24 earnings is the open question.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did receivable days extend 16.4 days to 84.5, and is any of that customer-concentration or collection-quality driven?
How much of the $15.0m working-capital build is inventory that will unwind in FY24 versus a permanently higher operating base?
When does capex intensity normalise back toward historical levels, and what is the expected payback on the FY23 step-up?
Is the 1.5 cps dividend sustainable if free cash flow remains negative into FY24?
What drove the H2 earnings softness implied by the half-year shape, and is it continuing into early FY24?

This briefing cannot assess forward earnings trajectory, customer-concentration risk, or the expected return on the elevated capex programme because no FY24 guidance, forward-work backlog, or project-economics disclosure is supplied in this release.

Chat

Ask about RAK FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Rakon's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RAK FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Rakon's FY23 result.

Why did receivable days extend 16.4 days to 84.5, and is any of that customer-concentration or collection-quality driven?Why does "Cash conversion deteriorated sharply" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for RAK after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

RAK FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

RAK FY23 Results and Business Update Presentation

FY23 / results presentation↗

RAK FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

RAK FY23 Results Market Release

FY23 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Rakon Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Rakon FY22 Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

Rakon FY22 Results Announcement

FY22 / results release↗

Interim context

Rakon 1H23 Interim Report

HY23 / financial report↗

Rakon 1H23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

Rakon 1H23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results release↗

Release context

Rakon Guidance Update and Outlook

FY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 26.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -29.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 4.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 14.7%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -0.40x, 0.00x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RAK publishes next

Get the next Rakon briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.