Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Rakon (RAK) / HY26

Revenue up 30.2% but Rakon stays loss-making with trade debtors surging 52.9%

Strong demand recovery lifted Underlying EBITDA 149% and narrowed the PBT loss by 73.6%, but a NZ$18.8m receivables build means cash is not yet

Technology / Electronics

RAK revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $54.2m, versus $41.7m in HY25.

RAK EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 6.6%, versus -37.9% in HY25.

RAK operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.4m, versus $8.3m in HY25.

RAK working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 RAK: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $33.8m; 3-period range $-18.7m to $28.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$33.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$26.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-18.7m.
  • HY25 RAK: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-18.7m; 3-period range $24m to $33.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-18.7m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$28.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-18.7m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$28.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
28 November 2025
Published
14 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$54.2m

+30.2% ↑ vs $41.7m

EBITDA

$3.6m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

−$3m

+71.2% ↑ vs −$10.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$6.4m

-23.7% ↓ vs $8.3m

Operating profit

−$4.1m

+73.9% ↑ vs −$15.8m

Profit before tax

−$4m

+73.5% ↑ vs −$15.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$12.4m

-21.5% ↓ vs $15.8m

Total assets

$230.9m

+19.1% ↑ vs $193.9m

What changed

Rakon's 30.2% revenue growth to NZ$54.2m is the standout movement in HY26, and its significance lies in how sharply it reverses the trend: Annolyse's historical baseline for Rakon shows a three-period mean revenue growth rate of -19.9% (range -32.0% to +2.0%), making this result well above the normal range

The company remains loss-making — PBT of -NZ$4.0m and NPAT of -NZ$3.0m — but the PBT loss narrowed by 73.6% from -NZ$15.1m in HY25, driven by both volume recovery and a gross margin expansion of 11 percentage points to 48.8%.

Operating cash flow fell 23.7% to NZ$6.4m despite the earnings improvement, and pre-lease free cash flow was -NZ$1.5m. The headline driver is a NZ$18.8m increase in trade debtors (up 52.9% to NZ$54.4m), which pushed operating working capital up NZ$24.0m to NZ$111.1m. Borrowings more than doubled to NZ$11.6m, partially funding this working capital build.

All three reported segments grew: Telecommunications (NZ$25.0m, +48.8% YoY) became the largest segment; Aerospace & Defence reached NZ$20.1m (+19.6%) with a disclosed gross margin of 64%; and Positioning contributed NZ$6.3m.

What matters

Receivables build is the central cash quality concern

Trade debtors at NZ$54.4m now equal one full period's revenue, and debtor days extended to 182.7 from 155.6 in HY25. This is the primary reason operating cash flow fell even as earnings improved. Whether this reflects longer payment terms granted to win Telecommunications volume, timing of large end-of-period shipments, or a structural change in customer mix is not explained in the release, and it materially affects the read on earnings quality.

Gross margin expansion is real but mix-dependent. The 11ppt improvement to 48.8% reflects both volume recovery (scale absorption) and the growth of Aerospace & Defence, where disclosed gross margin of 64% is well above Telecommunications at 42%. Telecommunications is now the largest segment at 46% of revenue; if that mix persists, the structural ceiling on blended margin is lower than the current result suggests.

Leverage has moved quickly. Net debt shifted from approximately -NZ$10.2m (net cash) to -NZ$0.8m (near-neutral) in one half-year, primarily because cash fell to NZ$12.4m and borrowings doubled to NZ$11.6m. The business is not yet in a leveraged position, but the direction of travel — funding a working capital build with debt while remaining NPAT-negative — is a balance-sheet dynamic worth monitoring.

Expectations

No formal guidance was provided

The FY25 full-year shape shows Rakon is historically second-half weighted: in FY25, the first half contributed only 40.2% of full-year revenue, and the implied second half generated NZ$62.0m. If HY26 annualises to approximately NZ$108.5m, the current half is running ahead of the FY25 run-rate, which is consistent with the company's largest-ever Aerospace & Defence backlog exceeding NZ$75m and the Telecommunications recovery. However, the absence of formal guidance means investors must rely on that backlog disclosure and segment commentary rather than a stated financial target.

The pattern of second-half profitability is important: in FY25 the implied second half produced positive NPAT of NZ$4.5m, rescuing a first-half loss of NZ$10.4m. With HY26's first-half loss already narrowed to -NZ$3.0m, a repeat of the second-half improvement pattern would deliver the company's first full-year profitable result in recent periods — but cash conversion would need to improve significantly for that to translate into meaningful free cash flow.

Quality of result

The earnings improvement is operationally grounded: revenue recovery is broad-based, gross margin expansion appears driven by genuine volume and mix effects rather than one-off items, and the company has disclosed no non-recurring gains distorting PBT or NPAT

In that sense, the loss-narrowing is durable at the operating level. However, the company remains NPAT-negative and pre-lease FCF-negative at -NZ$1.5m, and the tax benefit reducing the effective rate to 25.6% — below the company's historical range of 28.5%-213.8% — has modestly flattered NPAT relative to PBT (the growth gap is 2.1 percentage points).

The more important quality concern is the receivables position. NZ$54.4m in trade debtors against NZ$6.4m of operating cash flow means reported earnings are substantially uncollected. Capex at 14.5% of revenue (NZ$7.9m) is elevated relative to operating cash generation, and the combination leaves the balance sheet more stretched than the P&L improvement implies. Until receivables conversion accelerates, the earnings improvement should be treated as partially deferred from a cash perspective.

Unresolved

Open questions

What are the payment terms driving the 52.9% increase in trade debtors, and does this reflect specific customer arrangements or a structural shift in the Telecommunications customer base?
Why did operating cash flow fall 23.7% in a period where earnings improved materially — is this a timing issue expected to reverse in 2H26, or does it reflect a sustained lengthening of the cash cycle?
How durable is the Telecommunications recovery given it was described as severely impaired in HY25, and what proportion of the NZ$25.0m revenue is contracted versus order-by-order?
Will the NZ$75m+ Aerospace & Defence backlog translate into second-half revenue on the pace implied by current annualised figures, and what are the delivery risk factors?
Is the doubling of borrowings to NZ$11.6m a deliberate facility drawdown to fund working capital, and what headroom remains under existing credit facilities?

This briefing cannot assess the collectability timeline for the outstanding receivables balance or the contract-by-contract terms underpinning the Telecommunications revenue recovery.

Chat

Ask about RAK HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Rakon's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RAK HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Rakon's HY26 result.

What are the payment terms driving the 52.9% increase in trade debtors, and does this reflect specific customer arrangements or a structural shift in the Telecommunications customer base?Why does "Receivables build is the central cash quality concern" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for RAK after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

RAK 1H26 Interim Report

HY26 / financial report↗

RAK 1H26 Market release

HY26 / results release↗

RAK 1H26 Results announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

RAK 1H26 Results presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

RAK HY2025 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

RAK HY25 Financial results presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

RAK HY25 Market Release

HY25 / results release↗

RAK Results Announcement HY2025

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Rakon 2025 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Rakon 2025 Annual Report Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Rakon 2024 Annual Meeting Voting Results

HY25 / commentary↗

Rakon 2025 Annual Meeting Voting Results

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 176.7% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 2.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 30.2% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RAK publishes next

Get the next Rakon briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.