Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Turners Automotive Group (TRA) / FY20

Turners PBT up 28.5% on 10.7% revenue decline as assets nearly doubled

Margin expansion across three of four segments lifted earnings, but borrowings rose 94.3% and cash fell 63.8% as inventory more than doubled.

Consumer / Automotive retail and finance

TRA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $450.2m, versus $416.1m in FY24.

TRA EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was 14.1%, versus 14.1% in HY22.

TRA operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was -$75m, versus $29.7m in FY24.

TRA working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY20 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $20.1m; 3-period range $0m to $1.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$20.1m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY21 TRA: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.1m; 3-period range $0.9m to $5.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.1m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $5.8m; 3-period range $-1.1m to $1.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • FY24 TRA: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0m; 3-period range $0.5m to $20.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.0m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.0m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
25 May 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY20 vs FY20

Revenue

$296.5m

-10.7% ↓ vs $332.2m

Net profit after tax

$26.9m

+28.1% ↑ vs $21m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$10.9m

n/m ↑ vs −$0.03m

Final dividend per share

6.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$37.4m

+28.5% ↑ vs $29.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$11.9m

-63.8% ↓ vs $32.8m

Total assets

$718.5m

+98.3% ↑ vs $362.3m

What changed

Revenue fell 10.7% to $296.5m, yet profit before tax rose 28.5% to $37.4m and NPAT rose 28.1% to $26.9m

The earnings lift on a contracting top line reflects margin expansion in Automotive Retail (7.7% vs 6.1%), Finance (33.0% vs 26.6%) and Insurance (22.4% vs 14.1%), partly offset by Credit, where segment result fell to $5.1m from $6.5m on a 28% revenue decline.

Operating cash flow swung from roughly nil to $10.9m, and capex was cut 55.1% to $8.6m, which means free cash flow pre-lease of $2.2m versus a $19.3m outflow prior. But the balance sheet expanded sharply: total assets up 98.3% to $718.5m, gross borrowings up 94.3% to $339.6m, equity up 79.9% to $233.6m, and cash on hand down 63.8% to $11.9m. A final dividend of 6.0 cps takes the full-year payout to 20.0 cps.

What matters

Earnings quality lifted despite COVID-era revenue pressure

Three of four segments delivered margin expansion and the mix tilted toward higher-margin Finance and Insurance. PBT growth of 28.5% on a 10.7% revenue decline is operating leverage in the wrong direction for revenue but the right direction for unit economics. This matters because it suggests the FY21 result is not purely a tax or one-off effect — the cleaner PBT line carries the growth, with the PBT-to-NPAT growth gap only 0.4pp.

Balance sheet roughly doubled, and the disclosure does not fully explain it. Total assets rose by $356.1m and gross borrowings by $164.8m. Inventory alone grew 113.3% to $30.2m, lifting inventory days from 15.6 to 37.2. The scale of the asset and funding expansion is consistent with a material step-up in the on-balance-sheet finance receivables book or an acquisition, but the supplied excerpts do not name the driver. Without clarity, the leverage read is materially worse: net debt rose to $327.7m from $142.0m.

Credit segment weakened while management talks of "high quality lending growth" in Finance. Credit revenue fell 28.6% and segment result fell 21.5%, attributed in the release to corporate and bank customers being reluctant to pursue debt during COVID. The juxtaposition with Finance growth suggests internal substitution rather than a uniform credit market.

Expectations

Management has stated a target of a further 31% increase in Underlying NPBT from FY21 to FY24 (a ~9.4% CAGR), and notes that "new car supply chain issues" are expected to continue for 12–18 months

The full-year dividend of 20.0 cps beat guidance of 18.0 cps, signalling confidence in earnings durability.

No prior-period seasonality benchmark is supplied, but the HY20 split shows roughly 47.6% of FY revenue and 50% of NPAT in the first half. That points to a flatter half-on-half profile than typical retail, so FY22 phasing should hinge on supply availability rather than seasonality. The combination of supply constraints and an inventory build is the gap to watch.

Quality of result

The reported earnings growth is supported by genuine segment margin expansion, not tax distortion

The current effective tax rate of 28.1% is broadly normal, and the prior comparable carried an unusual -27.9% effective rate, so the PBT line is the cleaner operating read; on that measure growth was 28.5%.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the $164.8m increase in gross borrowings and the $356.1m increase in total assets — finance book expansion, an acquisition, or both?
Why did inventory more than double to $30.2m, and is this a deliberate position against the disclosed 12–18 month supply constraint?
Is the Insurance segment margin step-up from 14.1% to 22.4% structural or claims-experience-driven?
Why did Credit segment revenue and result decline, and does management expect a recovery as corporate borrowers re-engage?
How does the 9.4% CAGR Underlying NPBT target reconcile with continued new-car supply disruption?

This briefing cannot assess the specific composition of the balance sheet expansion or whether the borrowings increase is matched by finance receivables, because the supplied disclosures do not identify the driver.

Chat

Ask about TRA FY20

Ask follow-up questions about Turners Automotive Group's FY20 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TRA FY20

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Turners Automotive Group's FY20 result.

What drove the $164.8m increase in gross borrowings and the $356.1m increase in total assets — finance book expansion, an acquisition, or both?Why does "Earnings quality lifted despite COVID-era revenue pressure" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY20?What should I watch next for TRA after FY20?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Turners delivers record earnings for FY21

FY20 / results release↗

Turners FY21 results announcement

FY20 / financial report↗

Turners FY21 results presentation

FY20 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Turners Annual Report 31 March 2020

FY20 / financial report↗

Interim context

Results Announcement HY21

HY20 / financial report↗

Release context

Turners FY21 results analyst and investor webinar

FY20 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 37 days, +22 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 19.1%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -10.7% for this reporting period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.4pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TRA publishes next

Get the next Turners Automotive Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.