Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Turners Automotive Group (TRA) / FY26

Credit Management impairment of $7.5m masks core-segment growth at TRA

Reported NPAT slipped to $38.2m even as Auto Retail, Finance and Insurance segments all delivered higher profit results.

Consumer / Automotive retail and finance

TRA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $450.2m, versus $416.1m in FY24.

TRA EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was 14.1%, versus 14.1% in HY22.

TRA operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was -$75m, versus $29.7m in FY24.

TRA working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY20 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $20.1m; 3-period range $0m to $1.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$20.1m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY21 TRA: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.1m; 3-period range $0.9m to $5.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.1m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $5.8m; 3-period range $-1.1m to $1.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • FY24 TRA: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0m; 3-period range $0.5m to $20.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.0m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.0m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
21 May 2026
Published
22 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$450.2m

+9.0% ↑ vs $412.9m

Net profit after tax

$38.2m

-1.0% ↓ vs $38.6m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$75m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Full-year dividend per share

33.0c

+13.8% ↑ vs 29.0c

Total assets

$1.1b

+16.7% ↑ vs $917.8m

What changed

Reported net profit after tax came in at $38.2m, essentially level with FY25's $38.6m, even as the company describes FY26 as a record result

The gap between headline and underlying performance reflects a $7.5m intangible impairment in the Credit Management segment, which swung that division from a $3.5m profit to a $5.6m loss. The three core divisions all delivered higher segment results: Auto Retail $32.6m (from $29.1m), Finance $19.2m (from $12.2m), and Insurance $17.3m (from $16.2m).

Operating cash flow swung from +$34.0m to -$75.0m, capex more than doubled to $41.7m, and gross borrowings rose $140.3m to $586.3m, lifting net debt to $566.1m. Revenue moved to $450.2m from $412.9m, though the underlying growth comparison carries a basis-discontinuity caveat that affects how cleanly the FY25-to-FY26 change can be read.

What matters

- The $7.5m Credit Management impairment is the single line item separating a flat headline NPAT from the underlying segment-level growth the release describes

The company quantifies normalised NPBT at $63.2m versus statutory profit before tax of $55.8m. The non-recurring nature changes how the headline number should be read, though both statutory PBT and NPAT growth carry basis-discontinuity caveats that limit how much weight any single growth comparison can hold.

  • Cash conversion deteriorated sharply: operating cash flow of -$75.0m and free cash flow pre-lease of -$116.7m, with FCF-to-NPAT at -305.7%. For an automotive finance issuer, a negative OCF accompanying receivables growth is partly structural because finance receivables are typically funded via additional borrowings rather than operating cash. The $140.3m increase in gross debt to fund book growth is consistent with that model, but the absolute scale and the swing from +$34.0m warrant attention to funding cost and credit-loss outlook.

  • Capex intensity rose to 9.3% of revenue from 4.5%, with $41.7m invested in property, plant, equipment and intangibles versus $18.6m. The supplied release excerpts do not break the spend into components, so the return profile of this step-up is not visible from the disclosed material.

Expectations

The company has brought forward its $65m NPBT target from FY28 to FY27, implying a moderate required compound growth from statutory PBT of $55.8m (the analytical pass calculates around 2.9% CAGR to that target)

The release also references FY31 strategic targets but does not quantify them in the supplied excerpts. Forward dividend guidance is 32.0 cents per share for FY27 versus 33.0 cents per share declared across FY26 in total. No volume, gross-profit-per-unit, or revenue targets are disclosed in the supplied material, so the release supports a trajectory read toward NPBT but not toward top-line shape.

Quality of result

Record sale adds cash-flow context, with NZ$287.3m disclosed value and NZ$300m acquisition price, but the operating signals carry the main analytical weight

The headline-to-underlying gap is mostly attributable to one identifiable non-cash item, which supports a more constructive read on core operations than the flat NPAT line implies. Auto Retail revenue rose to $315.3m with derived segment margin around 10.3%, Finance segment profit grew materially to $19.2m on revenue of $77.0m, and Insurance segment margin held near 34%. These movements suggest core-franchise momentum is intact at the segment level even where headline statutory growth metrics carry comparability caveats.

The cash and balance-sheet side is less clean. The -$75.0m OCF, doubled capex of $41.7m, and a $140.3m increase in gross borrowings indicate the FY26 result was funded by leverage rather than internally generated cash. Inventory days lengthened slightly to 21.8 from 19.6. For a vehicle finance business this funding shape is partly inherent to the model, but the pace warrants attention to funding cost, credit losses, and the cushion behind the dividend, which is not covered by free cash flow on a pre-lease basis in FY26.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove the $7.5m intangible impairment in Credit Management, and is further impairment risk in that segment contained?
How does management plan to return Credit Management to profitability, or is the segment being de-emphasised within the FY31 plan?
Why did capex more than double to $41.7m, and what is the expected return profile of that step-up in investment?
What is the forward outlook for funding cost and credit losses in the Finance segment as the receivables book and gross borrowings continue to expand?
Will the FY27 dividend guidance of 32.0 cents per share be funded from operating cash flow, or does it continue to rely on debt-funded balance-sheet growth?

This briefing cannot assess the credit quality of the finance receivables book or the specific drivers of the Credit Management impairment from the supplied material.

Chat

Ask about TRA FY26

Ask follow-up questions about Turners Automotive Group's FY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TRA FY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Turners Automotive Group's FY26 result.

What specifically drove the $7.5m intangible impairment in Credit Management, and is further impairment risk in that segment contained?Why does "- The $7.5m Credit Management impairment is the single line item separating a flat headline NPAT from the underlying segment-level growth the release describes" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY26?What should I watch next for TRA after FY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY256 Results Presentation

FY26 / results presentation↗

FY26 Results Announcement

FY26 / financial report↗

Record FY26 reinforces Turners' FY31 strategic targets

FY26 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Turners FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Interim context

Results announcement HY26

HY26 / financial report↗

Turners 1HY26 result announcement

HY26 / results release↗

Turners HY26 Half Year Results Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Release context

Reminder and weblink for results presentation

FY25 / commentary↗

Turners upgrades FY25 profit guidance for its fifth consecutive record result

FY25 / commentary↗

Results Date and Weblink for Turners FY26 Results Briefing

FY26 / commentary↗

Turners 2026 Investor Day Presentation

FY26 / commentary↗

Results of Turners 2025 Annual Meeting

HY26 / commentary↗

Weblink for Turners HY26 Results Presentation

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 3.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 78.2%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 9.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 12.0%, -0.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TRA publishes next

Get the next Turners Automotive Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.