Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • Developers

© 2026 Annolyse. Analytical briefings for NZX company announcements.

Table of contents

  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Analytical metrics
  8. Metric context
  9. Reference material
←Back to briefings
Turners Automotive Group (TRA) / HY22

NPAT up 26% on 17% revenue growth, but OCF swung NZD49.6m negative

Strong P&L momentum in automotive retail and finance is directly contradicted by a cash flow reversal that lifted gross borrowings $60m in six months.

Release date
18 November 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Table of Contents⌄
  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Analytical metrics
  8. Metric context
  9. Reference material

What changed

Turners Automotive Group (TRA) delivered HY22 revenue from continuing operations of NZD$164.6m, up 17% on HY21's $141.0m. PBT grew 24% to $23.2m (from $18.7m) and NPAT from continuing operations rose 26% to $16.9m (from $13.4m). Total net profit, which includes a contribution not fully broken out in the supplied extraction, reached $18.4m, up 37%. The interim dividend held at NZD$0.05 per share, consistent with the prior half.

The cash picture was the stark reversal. Operating cash flow came in at negative $22.7m against a positive $27.0m in HY21 — a swing of nearly $49.6m. Capex more than doubled to $8.5m from $3.8m. Gross borrowings expanded from $314.4m to $374.3m, a $59.9m increase, implying net debt of approximately $360m against cash of $14.2m.

The full-year FY21 seasonality pattern is relevant here: HY21 captured 62.8% of full-year NPAT and 55.5% of full-year revenue, meaning the second half historically has been materially softer on earnings.

What matters

The operating cash flow reversal is the central concern. A nearly $49.6m swing from positive to negative OCF while P&L profits improved 26% points to a significant working capital or balance sheet movement within the period — most likely growth in the consumer finance loan book, which in automotive retail and finance tends to flow through operating cash rather than investing cash. If receivable growth in the finance book is driving the OCF deterioration, it is not necessarily alarming, but it does mean the business is funding growth through borrowings rather than retained cash generation. The $59.9m lift in gross borrowings broadly corroborates this interpretation.

Earnings quality on the P&L is supported by strong revenue growth. A 17% revenue gain driving 24% PBT growth implies some operating leverage or improving credit margin. The company's own commentary in the FY21 anchor period referenced a strategy of attracting higher-quality borrowers with lower margins offset by lower impairments — if that dynamic persisted into HY22, reported margins may be understating underlying credit risk reduction. Gross margin detail is not disclosed, so this cannot be confirmed.

The gap between continuing operations NPAT ($16.9m) and total net profit ($18.4m) implies a $1.5m post-tax contribution from non-continuing or non-recurring items that is not decomposed in the available disclosures. This is a modest gap but worth tracking.

Expectations

No formal earnings targets were disclosed for HY22 or FY22. Using the HY21/FY21 shape as a guide, HY22 was again a first-half weighted period (HY21 was 62.8% of full-year NPAT), so the implied second-half NPAT run rate from FY21 precedent would be roughly $10m. If the same seasonal pattern holds in FY22, annualised NPAT from continuing operations would be approximately $26–27m — which is broadly consistent with HY22's $16.9m representing around 63% of an estimated full year.

Annualised HY22 revenue of approximately $329m sits about 11% above the FY21 anchor of $296.5m, which is plausible if the automotive retail market remained buoyant. However, the OCF profile complicates any simple extrapolation: FY21 OCF was only $10.9m for the full year despite the second half generating $33.6m, meaning HY21's $27m positive OCF was largely reversed in HY21's second half. Whether a similar reversal occurs in HY22's second half, or whether the HY22 cash outflow deepens, depends on loan book growth trajectory and inventory management — neither of which is forward-guided.

Quality of result

The P&L result looks relatively durable in terms of top-line growth, which is broad-based across what appears to be automotive retail volumes and finance book origination. The 24% PBT growth on 17% revenue growth is a credible result for this segment if vehicle margins held and credit costs remained contained.

The cash result is a different matter. Negative $22.7m OCF against $16.9m NPAT implies free cash flow (pre-lease) of approximately negative $31.2m — meaning the dividend is not covered by cash generation. The interim dividend implies a payout of roughly $3.5m (at $0.05 per share across approximately 70m shares implied by the payout ratio analysis), which is entirely funded by borrowings in this half. That is not unusual for a finance company where book growth requires upfront capital, but it does mean the sustainability of the dividend depends on the quality and yield of the receivables being originated, not on near-term cash generation.

Inventory days and receivable days on the trade book are essentially unchanged, which is a modest positive for retail discipline — no evidence of markdown pressure or slow-moving stock build on the used-car side.

Unresolved

  • The driver of the $49.6m OCF swing is not decomposed in the available disclosures. Whether it is consumer receivables growth, floor-plan inventory financing, or other working capital requires the full cash flow statement breakdown.
  • Gross margin and credit impairment trends are not available in the normalized extraction, making it impossible to assess whether the earnings quality improvement cited in FY21 strategy (better borrower quality, lower impairments) carried into HY22.
  • The $1.5m gap between continuing NPAT and total net profit is unexplained — the nature of the contributing item (discontinued operation, asset sale, or other) is not identified in the supply.
  • Leverage trajectory is the key watch item: borrowings have grown $59.9m in six months to $374.3m, and the full-year cash generation profile will determine whether this is self-funding book growth or structural leverage creep.
  • Second-half seasonality risk is real — FY21 precedent shows the second half contributed only $10m of full-year NPAT, so any market softening in the automotive or credit cycle would have an outsized HY22 second-half effect.

This briefing cannot assess whether HY22's loan book growth is being originated at acceptable credit quality, as impairment and arrears data were not included in the extraction.

Key metrics

← Swipe to view more
Key metrics table for Turners Automotive Group HY22
Metric HY22 HY21 Change
Revenue $164.6m $164.6m flat
Net profit after tax $16.9m $16.9m flat
Net cash inflow from operating activities −$22.7m −$22.7m flat
Interim dividend per share 5.0c 5.0c flat
Total assets $763.6m $763.6m flat

Analytical metrics

← Swipe to view more
Analytical metrics table for Turners Automotive Group HY22
Metric HY22 HY21 Context
PBT growth +0.0% — —
Effective tax rate 27.3% 27.3% —
FCF pre-lease −$31.2m −$31.2m $0m
FCF / NPAT -185.2% -185.2% complementary conversion metric
Capex % revenue 5.2% 5.2% —
Capex −$8.5m −$8.5m $0m
Debtor days 8.0 8.0 +0.0 days
Inventory days 35.3 35.3 +0.0 days
Trade debtors $7.2m $7.2m $0m
Net debt $360.1m $360.1m $0m
Gross borrowings $374.3m $374.3m $0m
Payout ratio vs NPAT 25.5% — —
Payout ratio vs FCF pre-lease -13.7% — not covered
ROE (annualised) 6.8% 6.8% Flat
HY21 share of FY21 revenue 55.5% — Other half was 44.5%
HY21 share of FY21 NPAT 62.8% — Other half was 37.2%
Profit from continuing operations $16.9m $16.9m $0m

This analysis was generated using Annolyse, an AI-powered tool that analyses NZX company announcements. The analysis is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. This is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Source-backed analysis from the filing set attached to this briefing.

Metric context

Trajectory before this result

A compact view of the company's recent revenue and margin path, derived from the same metrics history that powers the company page.

TRA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

← Swipe to view more
TRA revenue trajectory preview table
PeriodTRA
HY23$185m
FY22$342m
HY21$164.6m
HY22$164.6m
FY20$296.5m

TRA EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.

← Swipe to view more
TRA EBITDA margin preview table
PeriodTRA
HY2314.1%
FY22n/a
HY21n/a
HY22n/a
FY20n/a

Appendix

Reference material

Company materials considered in this briefing.

Current period

Turners Interim Report 30 September 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Turners Interim Report 30 September 2021

HY21 / financial report↗

Full-year context

Turners Annual Report FY21

FY21 / financial report↗

Related insight

See how dividend coverage compares across covered companies

→

See how earnings quality compares across covered companies

→

Email updates

Want briefings like this for the next reporting season?

Get the next Annolyse briefing by email when it is published.

TRA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

TRA EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.