Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Turners Automotive Group (TRA) / HY25

Finance and Insurance lifted PBT 4.7% as Auto Retail eased revenue 2.5% lower

Earnings held up versus a -2.5% top line that sits well below the 14.9% historical growth mean, with Auto Retail's segment result down 18%.

Consumer / Automotive retail and finance

TRA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $342m, versus $296.5m in FY20.

TRA EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
EBITDA margin across covered periods.

TRA operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was -$43.9m, versus $10.9m in FY20.

TRA working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY20 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $20.1m; 3-period range $0m to $1.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$20.1m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY21 TRA: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.1m; 3-period range $0.9m to $5.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.1m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 TRA: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $5.8m; 3-period range $-1.1m to $1.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 15 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$766.8m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

20.07x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.42

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

2.41x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

3.9%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
25 November 2024
Published
29 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$208.6m

-2.5% ↓ vs $213.9m

Net profit after tax

$19.3m

+4.3% ↑ vs $18.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$26.9m

+84.3% ↑ vs $14.6m

Interim dividend per share

7.0c

+16.7% ↑ vs 6.0c

Cash and cash equivalents

$16.7m

+32.0% ↑ vs $12.6m

Total assets

$875.5m

+2.7% ↑ vs $852.9m

What changed

Revenue fell 2.5% to NZ$208.6m, the first decline in the supplied history and well below the 14.9% three-period growth mean Annolyse has on file (range 12.4%-16.7%)

Despite that, PBT grew 4.7% to NZ$26.9m and NPAT grew 4.3% to NZ$19.3m, because the segment mix shifted away from Automotive Retail toward higher-margin Finance and Insurance.

Operating cash flow jumped 84.3% to NZ$26.9m, helped by inventory drawdown, but capex more than doubled to NZ$18.4m (8.8% of revenue versus 4.1% prior). Pre-lease FCF still improved to NZ$8.5m, above the historical baseline range of -NZ$31.2m to NZ$5.9m. The interim dividend rose to 7.0 cps from 6.0 cps.

What matters

Segment composition has rotated, as management foreshadowed

Automotive Retail revenue fell to NZ$146.3m (-6.3%) and segment result dropped 18.4% to NZ$14.7m, with derived gross margin compressing from 11.5% to 10.0%. Finance revenue grew 11.1% to NZ$33.6m and result rose to NZ$8.1m from NZ$5.1m; Insurance revenue rose 4.3% with result at NZ$7.7m. Finance and Insurance together now contribute roughly half of segment profit, which is what is holding the group earnings line up against a softer used-car cycle.

Capex intensity has stepped up sharply. Capex of NZ$18.4m is +110.5% on prior and lifts capex/revenue from 4.1% to 8.8%. That is a meaningful reinvestment shift in a half where revenue went backwards, and it directly compresses pre-lease FCF conversion to 44.1% of NPAT. Whether this is a one-period catch-up or a sustained higher run-rate determines how much of the FCF improvement persists.

Cash generation looks better than the underlying ratio suggests. The 84.3% jump in OCF is partly a working-capital release: inventory days fell to 14.1 from 20.3 (below the 20.3-35.3 historical range) and trade debtors fell 35%. That release will not repeat at the same scale in H2.

Expectations

Management reaffirmed the FY25 NPBT target of more than NZ$50m and a medium-term FY28 NPBT target of NZ$65m, which Annolyse calculates implies a required CAGR of roughly 18.5%

HY25 PBT of NZ$26.9m puts the company on track for the FY25 line if H2 holds, but historically HY has been first-half weighted (HY24 was 51.4% of FY24 revenue and 56.1% of FY24 NPAT), so simple doubling of the half overstates the run-rate.

The FY28 NPBT goal is more demanding: it requires reacceleration from the current 4.7% PBT growth pace, which means the Finance and Insurance lift needs to keep compounding while Automotive Retail eventually stabilises.

Quality of result

The earnings result is genuine but lower quality than it looks at the headline

PBT margin of 12.9% sits exactly on its 12.9% historical mean, and NPAT margin at 9.3% is essentially in line with its 9.4% mean, so this is not a margin-led upgrade. The growth is coming from a deliberate mix shift that improved Finance and Insurance contribution while Auto Retail margin contracted.

Cash quality is mixed. Pre-lease FCF of NZ$8.5m is above Annolyse's historical baseline (mean -NZ$9.1m), but it benefits from inventory-days and debtor-days that both sit at the low end of the supplied historical ranges, so a chunk of the cash improvement is balance-sheet release rather than recurring conversion. Set against capex doubling, the durable underlying FCF run-rate is harder to read than the headline +NZ$2.6m uplift suggests. ROE moved fractionally to 6.7% from 6.6%, still well below the 11.1% historical mean, so the higher asset base (NZ$875.5m, above the NZ$763.6m-NZ$852.9m historical range) is not yet earning at the prior return level.

Unresolved

Open questions

Is the Automotive Retail margin compression cyclical with used-car demand, or is structural channel mix at work that will persist beyond a recovery?
What is the sustained capex run-rate after this step-up, and what payback is targeted for the incremental NZ$9.7m of spend?
How much of the inventory and receivables release in H1 reverses in H2, and what does management see as a normalised working-capital position?
What growth contribution from Finance and Insurance is required to bridge from current PBT to the FY28 NZ$65m NPBT target, and is that contingent on Auto Retail recovery?
Why has the dividend payout ratio against NPAT moved up to 32.1% from a 25%-28% historical range, and is this the new policy or a function of the FCF improvement?

This briefing cannot assess unit-economic detail within Finance (loan book quality, impairment trends) or Insurance (claims and underwriting margin), which would be needed to judge how durable the segment-driven earnings lift is.

Chat

Ask about TRA HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Turners Automotive Group's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TRA HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Turners Automotive Group's HY25 result.

Is the Automotive Retail margin compression cyclical with used-car demand, or is structural channel mix at work that will persist beyond a recovery?Why does "Segment composition has rotated, as management foreshadowed" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for TRA after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

Turners FY25 Half Year Results

HY25 / results announcement↗

Turners FY25 Half Year Results

HY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Turners HY24 Announcement

HY24 / results release↗

Turners HY24 Results

HY24 / financial report↗

Full-year context

FY24 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Turners delivers record FY24 earnings and lays out roadmap for future growth

FY24 / financial report↗

Release context

Chair and CEO addresses presented at the Annual Meeting held on 18 September 2024

HY25 / commentary↗

Weblink for Turners HY25 Results Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 32.1%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.4pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -2.5% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 6.7%, +0.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TRA publishes next

Get the next Turners Automotive Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.