Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Winton Land (WIN) / HY26

Settlements collapsed to 14 units, swinging operating cash $37m negative

Revenue fell 60.0% and net debt nearly doubled as inventories built, even as the commercial portfolio swung to a positive segment result.

Property / Residential development

WIN revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $32.4m, versus $155.4m in FY25.

WIN EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 2.4%, versus 13.7% in FY25.

WIN operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$9.9m, versus $42.3m in FY25.

WIN working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $31m, versus -$21.6m in FY25.
Release date
20 February 2026
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$32.4m

-60.0% ↓ vs $81.1m

EBITDA

$0.79m

n/m ↑ vs −$0.06m

Net profit after tax

−$0.9m

+55.0% ↑ vs −$2m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$9.9m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

−$2.6m

-13.4% ↓ vs −$2.3m

Profit before tax

−$3.3m

-37.5% ↓ vs −$2.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$14.5m

-44.5% ↓ vs $26.1m

Total assets

$719.5m

+8.5% ↑ vs $663.3m

What changed

Settlement activity is the central story

Residential settlements fell to 14 units from 90 in HY25, dragging revenue down 60.0% to $32.4m and pushing operating cash flow from a $27.1m inflow to a $9.9m outflow — a $37.0m swing inside a single half. Inventories rose $31.0m to $249.8m and gross borrowings increased 50.4% to $119.4m, lifting net debt from $53.3m to $104.9m and reducing cash from $26.1m to $14.5m.

Headline earnings tell a softer story than the operating result. EBITDA edged into positive territory at $0.8m (HY25: -$0.1m) on a stronger commercial contribution, but profit before tax worsened 34.8% to -$3.3m. Reported NPAT improved 55.5% to -$0.9m only because the effective tax rate moved to +72.8% (HY25: 17.4%), a tax credit on the loss rather than an operating gain.

Segment mix shifted materially: commercial revenue grew 67% to $17.4m and turned the segment to a $1.1m result; residential development revenue fell to $14.7m from $70.6m and produced a -$1.3m result.

What matters

Cash conversion and balance-sheet funding

The $37.0m operating-cash swing combined with $31.0m of inventory build and a $40.0m increase in gross borrowings means the development pipeline is being financed by debt rather than settlement proceeds. Current OCF/EBITDA is n/m and free cash flow before leases was -$11.7m. For a residential developer, this matters because cash earnings and balance-sheet flexibility are tied directly to the timing of unit settlements.

Tax-driven NPAT improvement masks an operating step-down. PBT growth of -34.8% is the cleaner read on operating performance; the +55.5% NPAT growth reflects a 72.8% effective tax rate on a small loss, not improved trading. Treating NPAT as the headline would overstate progress against HY25.

Mix is rotating from settlements to commercial rent. Residential's share of revenue fell from 87.1% to 45.4% while commercial moved from 12.9% to 53.8%. Commercial rental and sub-developer income now carries the segment result, but at $17.4m it is too small to backfill a $55.9m fall in residential revenue.

Expectations

No forward earnings target is supplied

The release flags a $239.8m pre-sale book at 31 December 2025 and Fast-track Approvals Act decisions expected in H2 FY26. Pre-sales equate to 3.7x annualised current-half revenue of $64.8m, which supports forward revenue capacity but does not specify timing of settlement recognition.

The supplied shape context shows HY25 represented 52.1% of FY25 revenue but only -19.4% of FY25 NPAT, with the implied H2 FY25 contributing $74.4m of revenue and $12.3m of NPAT. HY26 has started weaker than HY25 on both revenue and operating cash, so any material recovery to FY25-style full-year earnings would need to come through H2 FY26 settlements that are not yet quantified in the release.

Quality of result

The earnings improvement is low quality on two counts

First, the move from -$0.1m to $0.8m EBITDA is small and explained largely by commercial portfolio swing rather than core residential margin; residential gross margin moved to -9.2% from 8.8% on the dramatically lower volume. Second, the apparent NPAT improvement is a tax-line effect — PBT actually deteriorated by $0.8m.

The cash result is weaker than reported earnings imply. Operating cash flow turned negative by $9.9m, capex of $1.8m took free cash flow before leases to -$11.7m, and the FCF-to-NPAT ratio of n/m is a sign of disconnect rather than strong conversion. Capex spend collapsed from $46.9m to $1.8m, which cushioned the cash outflow but represents reduced investment rather than improved trading. The combination of inventory build, lower cash, and higher borrowings indicates the half was balance-sheet funded.

Unresolved

Open questions

What settlement volume and revenue does management expect in H2 FY26, and how much is contracted versus speculative within the $239.8m pre-sale book?
Why is the effective tax rate 72.8% this half versus 17.4% in HY25, and is that level expected to persist?
How much undrawn debt headroom remains on the MMLIC and MCCB facilities after the $40.0m increase in gross borrowings?
Which Fast-track Approvals Act decisions are pending in H2 FY26 and what revenue or settlement timing depends on them?
Is the commercial portfolio's $1.1m segment result sustainable, or did it benefit from one-off rent or fair-value items not separately disclosed?

This briefing cannot assess project-level pre-sale conversion timing, debt facility covenants and headroom, or fair-value movements within the commercial portfolio because those details are not in the supplied materials.

Chat

Ask about WIN HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Winton Land's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about WIN HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Winton Land's HY26 result.

What settlement volume and revenue does management expect in H2 FY26, and how much is contracted versus speculative within the $239.8m pre-sale book?Why does "Cash conversion and balance-sheet funding" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for WIN after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report↗

Interim Results FY26 Announcement

HY26 / results release↗

Interim Results Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

NZX Form - Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Interim Results FY25 Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

NZX Form - Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Annual Results Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

NZX Form - Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Winton – Results of 2025 Annual Meeting

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 90.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 132.90x, +1084.70x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -60.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -0.2%, +0.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when WIN publishes next

Get the next Winton Land briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.