Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

Compare covered companies

Hallenstein Glasson (HLG)Savor (SVR)The Colonial Motor Company (CMO)

Showing 3 companies.

← Swipe to view more
Company comparison table
MetricHLG · HY26SVR · FY26CMO · HY26
Revenue$275.2m$55.2m$552.4m
Revenue growth %

Get updates for HLG vs SVR vs CMO

Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.

14.7%
-2.6%
8.8%
Operating profit$41.1m$8m$15.3m
Operating profit margin %15.0%14.5%Outside range highOutside range high ebitda margin. 14.5%; 5-period range 9.8% to 14.2%. EBITDA margin: 14.5%, above normal range; 5-period mean 11.5%, range 9.8%-14.2%.2.8%
PBT$39.8m$1.8m$15.3m
PBT growth %33.1%—35.4%
NPAT$28m$1.3m$10.7m
NPAT growth %32.1%—55.1%Unprecedented highUnprecedented high npat growth. 55.1%; 4-period range -35% to 41.4%. NPAT growth: 55.1%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean -10.1%, range -35.0%-41.4%.
Operating cash flow$53.5m$6.9m$42.9m
OCF / Operating profit %129.9%85.8%280.5%
FCF pre-lease$40.9m$4.6m—
DPS29.0c—15.0c
Payout ratio vs NPAT %61.7%Outside range lowOutside range low payout ratio versus npat. 61.7%; 3-period range 68.8% to 90.1%. Payout ratio versus NPAT: 61.7%, below normal range; 3-period mean 76.0%, range 68.8%-90.1%.—45.7%
ROE %23.1%6.9%Outside range highOutside range high roe. 6.9%; 4-period range -35.1% to 3.6%. ROE: 6.9%, above normal range; 4-period mean -13.0%, range -35.1%-3.6%.3.4%

Source: latest published result for each selected company.

HLG vs SVR vs CMO comparison

Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.