Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

Compare

Compare covered companies

Select two or three covered companies to compare the latest source-backed filing metrics side by side.

Mercury NZ (MCY)Vector (VCT)Contact Energy (CEN)

Showing 3 companies.

← Swipe to view more
Company comparison table
MetricMCY · HY26VCT · HY26CEN · HY26
Revenue$1.7b$594.4m$1.6b
Revenue growth %

Get updates for MCY vs VCT vs CEN

Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.

-5.2%
6.1%
-5.3%
EBITDAF$537m$223.1m$500m
EBITDAF margin %32.3%37.5%30.9%Outside range highOutside range high ebitda margin. 30.9%; 3-period range 23.7% to 27.1%. EBITDA margin: 30.9%, above normal range; 3-period mean 25.2%, range 23.7%-27.1%.
PBT$27m$170.4m$289m
PBT growth %—1.1%43.8%
NPAT$20m$113m$204m
NPAT growth %——43.7%
Operating cash flow$351m—$308m
OCF / EBITDAF %65.4%—61.6%
FCF pre-lease$78m—$249m
FCF post-lease——$249m
DPS10.0c12.5c16.0c
Payout ratio vs NPAT %—110.6%76.6%

Source: latest published result for each selected company.

MCY vs VCT vs CEN comparison

Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.