NZX company comparison
Compare NZX companies side by side
Select two or three covered companies to compare their latest source-backed financial metrics, reporting periods, and analytical context.
AFC Group Holdings (AFC)Hallenstein Glasson (HLG)The Colonial Motor Company (CMO)
Showing 3 companies.
← Swipe to view more
| Metric | AFC · FY26 | HLG · FY26 | CMO · FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0.16m | $563m | $1.1b |
| Revenue growth % | -78.3%Outside range low revenue growth. -78.3%; 5-period range -47.6% to 159%. Revenue growth: -78.3%, below normal range; 5-period mean 11.0%, range -47.6%-159.0%. | 19.6% | 7.1% |
| Operating profit | -$0.64m | $87.4m | — |
| Operating profit margin % | -395.0% | 15.5% | — |
| PBT | -$0.8m | $83.9m | $27.7m |
| PBT growth % | — | 43.7%Outside range high pbt growth. 43.7%; 5-period range -25.3% to 29.3%. PBT growth: 43.7%, above normal range; 5-period mean 11.8%, range -25.3%-29.3%. | 0.0% |
| NPAT | -$0.5m | $59.2m | $19.9m |
| NPAT growth % | — | 49.9%Unprecedented high npat growth. 49.9%; 5-period range -23.1% to 25%. NPAT growth: 49.9%, unprecedented high; 5-period mean 8.8%, range -23.1%-25.0%. | 8.7% |
| Operating cash flow | -$0.57m | $122.2m | — |
| OCF / Operating profit % | 89.5% | 139.8% | — |
| FCF pre-lease | -$0.58m | $92.9m | — |
| DPS | — | 40.0c | 25.0c |
| Payout ratio vs NPAT % | — | 69.6% | 65.8% |
| Annual payout ratio vs EPS % | — | 69.6% | 65.8% |
Source: latest published result for each selected company.
AFC vs HLG vs CMO comparison
Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.
Get updates for AFC vs HLG vs CMO
Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.